"Discover Success Power Points
The Secrets to Extraordinary Achievement"


What are the Secrets to Extraordinary Achievement?

Success power points is not Rocket Science, it requires basic understanding but very few Deal with it!

In just a few pages you will shatter every myth and every lie about personal & professional success! ...as well as uncovering strategies, tips and quotes that have been tested and proven over the years
by different experts in the field of personal and professional development.

In this e-book I have referred to these proven strategies as
"Success Power Points"
because of the innate power these strategies possess to bring about a change relevant to your personal and professional success. I'm confident that the information in this book will do a lot more for you with daily action.

Here's what you'll discover...

Success Power Point 1
Definite Purpose

Success Power Point 2
Information

Success Power Point 3
Taking Responsibility

Success Power Point 4
Power of Vision

Success Power Point 5
Personal Development

And Much More...

ALSO
You Will Discover How to

Get motivated and stay motivated,

Set attainable goals congruent with your core values,

Manage your time effectively,

Take action towards your desired goal and more....

Take action now and You will receive

these10 bonus resources

that are essential to your success for free:

Change Your Attitude With One Simple Task

Back when I was an automotive technician I used to tune and service many cars. Most of the work that I would do would be under the hood… unseen by my customers. But there was one final important step in the service process that made all the difference. Something that only took a minute but made all the difference in my customers attitude when they picked up their car.

I cleaned their windows.

This one simple task let the customers know that something positive was done to their car. They could see clearly again. The change was sometimes subtle, but the effect was always positive.

Is there something that you have been looking at for a long time that needs to be changed? So long in fact that you may not even notice it anymore? Here are five simple things that you can do today that may improve your attitude and bring a smile to your face. Most only take a few minutes but will reap a huge mental award. Why not choose one and do it today?

1. Clean off your desk. You’ve been staring at that mess for months. Why not take a few minutes today and completely clean it off, dust it, polish it and sit back and smile. You can do it!

2. Wash your car. It’s so dirty from the summer grime that you can barely see out. Take a few minutes today and clean it up. If you don’t have much time… take it to the car wash. A shiny car will bring a shiny new smile to your face.

3. Clean your sink. The dishes have piled up and the food stains abound. Why not wash the dishes and clean your sink. Make that sink shine. Don’t leave one spot. Get some elbow grease and do an amazing job. Stand back and admire your work. You know you can do this!

4. Clean out a closet. You can barely shut the door. The old clothes are piling up and you know it will be a disaster if someone else should open it up. Why not grab a a large plastic trash bag and spend a few minutes sorting through those old clothes and taking them to a needy charity. You’ll make life better for someone else and lessen your stress now that you can actually open the closet door.

5. Clean out your refrigerator. Start with the old milk cartons and work backwards. Get those plastic containers of who knows what and dump them down the garbage disposal. Bring over your trash can and start throwing out the old stuff. Then take everything else out and give it a good cleaning. Add a new box of baking soda, sort your items and stand back and smile. You now have a healthy and happy place in your kitchen.

Why not pick one item from the list and change your attitude today!

First Things First
If you were attending one of our "live" presentations before a group or if you were taking the complete self-study course, we would begin by asking you to keep a personal success journal. The first thing we would have you record in the journal is a personal inventory - a description of where you are, what resources you have, and where you want to go. The inventory enables people to assess their strengths and weaknesses. It gives them a clear starting point and a direction.

Note: If you order the complete course, you will receive a personal success journal as part of the package.

The Personal Inventory

The personal inventory covers the following in detail:

1. Evaluate your present financial status.
2. What is your state of health and physical fitness?
3. Describe your family life, your spouse, children and your relationships with them.
4. What are your relationships like with people in general?
5. What is your career - job - work - occupation and what is it like?
6. How do you feel most of the time - what is your outlook?
7. What do you do for recreation and entertainment?
8. What are you doing for self-improvement?
9. What kinds of activities are the most rewarding personally for you?
10. Write a general statement describing yourself and your life over all.

We complete the inventory by asking people to make a list of their goals. We ask the questions, "What would you like to achieve if your success were guaranteed? What goals or dreams do you have? What do you aspire to do and be?"

We suggest that you take a few minutes to do a personal inventory yourself. It is extremely beneficial. Before you begin, it's important to know where you are and where you want to go.

The Knowledge and Power course will show you how to use "Creative Visualization" to:

  • Organize yourself and prioritize your activities and focus your efforts
  • Eliminate the obstacles to your success
  • Learn how to embue your life with incredible joy and happiness
  • Eliminate cynacism and fault-finding
  • Learn how to see a new world full of possibilities
  • Learn the "magic" of good relationships
  • Formulate effective plans and attain your personal goals
  • Acquire a powerful, "never quit," winner's attitude
  • Learn the secret of being "lucky"
  • Release your hidden talents and abilities
  • Learn how to tap the source of unlimited energy and intelligence
  • Become a "super new you" with a "super new life!"

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

''''Discover Success Power Points  (0) 2007.08.22
Change Your Attitude With One Simple Task  (0) 2007.08.22
Proposals for Japan''s New Strategies  (0) 2007.08.10
Strategy - What is strategy?  (0) 2007.07.30
Put Value Creation First  (2) 2007.07.23
ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION: Face adverse effects to skillfully increase benefits

05/23/2007

・While increasing overall wealth, establish measures to prevent a further widening of disparities.

・Respect the WTO and share free-trade benefits with developing nations.

・Japan should push structural reform to open up its market for agricultural produce.

The world has become smaller. People manufacture products, move funds and work all across national boarders. Human economic activities have become broader and faster.

Competition among businesses and countries has intensified in a global market. Mutual economic reliance has deepened, and a crisis in one country has instant repercussions on other nations. National security and national interests can no longer be discussed without taking into account the increasingly global nature of the economy.

Japanese companies are playing a major role in advancing the global economy. Toyota Motor Corp. began full-scale overseas production in 1984. In only a little over 20 years since opening its first factory in the United States, Toyota now has 52 plants overseas in 27 countries and regions.

Direct investment in Southeast Asia, China, and other Asian countries has been growing rapidly in recent years. Integrated systems of production have been spreading in Asia. For example, engines and other individual components are manufactured in different countries and are then brought together to be assembled into complete vehicles. Sales companies and research and development centers follow wherever automakers go.

Initially, the opening of factories in the United States and Europe was intended to avoid trade disputes. But the situation is different in Asia. Automakers began focusing on developing nations with low labor costs following the yen's sharp appreciation in the mid-1980s. Once production takes off, employment increases and technologies are transferred.

If all goes well, global economic activities bring countless benefits.

* * *

The period from the late 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century was also one of great dynamism. But in that instance, the geographical area was limited to Europe, where the industrial revolution got started, and the United States, then regarded as the New World.

The main characteristic of the modern version that began in the 1980s was the rise of Asia.

During the 1980s, the U.S. and British governments pursued a neo-liberalism policy, calling on other countries to open their markets in accordance with market forces. Pretty soon, this movement spread around the world amid the first rumblings of the crumbling of socialism, thereby stimulating the operations of multinational corporations and accelerating globalization.

Yet, the global economy that is supposed to deliver economic growth and affluent lifestyles to people everywhere also has its weaknesses.

A report compiled by the World Bank in 2002 states that developing nations are divided between ones that are globalizing and quickly reducing poverty, and the others that have not done so and where poverty has become worse.

The nearly 3 billion people in China and the Indian Subcontinent have successfully caught the wave, while 2 billion people in Africa and South America have not. The countries that are lagging do not have any real hopes regarding their futures.

Disparities between countries are not the only problem as many people believe that widening income gaps within nations are exacerbated precisely because of the global economy.

Not only that, anti-globalization sentiment is growing in the United States, even though it regards itself as a leader of free trade. Critics complain that products manufactured in developing nations with low wages are flooding the U.S. market, undermining wages and cutting jobs.

In Europe, rising flows of immigrants from Africa and the Middle East are a growing problem. Meantime, China is trying to break away from poverty by integrating itself with the global economy. Yet, rectifying internal disparities has become a major hurdle for Beijing.

Global market competition creates clear divisions between winners and losers. People also tend to ignore the global environment, traditional cultures, and other values that cannot easily be measured with economic yardsticks. The assumption that all such problems will disappear once market principles have been thoroughly spread throughout the world is not very convincing.

* * *

Nonetheless, what will happen if we try to stop globalization? Previous globalization trends were disrupted by world wars and the Great Depression, with nations reverting to bloc economies and financial controls that allowed governments to heavily intervene in markets. But now industrialized nations cannot be allowed to shut their doors to developing countries just to protect their wealth.

A free market economy is very powerful, and sometimes it spins out of control. A global economy will bear rich fruit only with proper governance to oversee it. The touchstone will be revived trade negotiations that the World Trade Organization is pushing for.

Countries must humbly consider not only their own interests but also how to benefit others when establishing new rules for a global economy. Such efforts will help solidify the foundations for peace and stability that are essential elements in global politics.

The worst scenario would be for advanced nations to succumb to further protectionism. If they continue protecting their agricultural produce, developing countries that have nothing but primary products to export will not be able to benefit from free trade.

Criticism that Japan is not opening up agricultural markets is spreading in Asia and other developing countries.

The Japanese government began shifting toward policies to supplement income for financially struggling farmers, rather than protecting them with high tariffs. Japan has no chance against the United States and other countries with vast areas under cultivation. A calm discussion is required as to what degree the Japanese agricultural sector can be protected with financial assistance while promoting reform to lower costs and improve competitiveness.

It is also essential for Japan to bring in more foreign workers. The government must quickly work out policy measures to open up the job market for foreign workers and prepare to receive not only specialists but also a wide range of people. Acceptance of foreign capital is far too small compared with other advanced countries.

Japan's population is declining and its society is aging at the fastest pace in the world. There is no recourse save making the most of the energy of the global economy and growing along with other countries. Japan should venture to change its current inward-looking attitude.

At the same time, it must tackle widening internal disparities. In particular, unemployment remains high among young people, and income gaps are widening.

The government must focus on preventing wealth from becoming overly concentrated and on redistributing it, while providing education and training so that Japanese can perform at higher levels than people in developing nations.

The general public is becoming more sensitive to disparities, and this is a sign that vested interests have begun to be undermined through structural reform.

The government must remember that accelerated reform is the path to a brighter future.(IHT/Asahi: May 23,2007)

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

Change Your Attitude With One Simple Task  (0) 2007.08.22
Knowledge and Power  (0) 2007.08.22
Strategy - What is strategy?  (0) 2007.07.30
Put Value Creation First  (2) 2007.07.23
Blue Ocean Stretegy by W.Chan Kim  (0) 2007.07.23

Strategy - What is strategy?

Overall Definition:

Johnson and Scholes (Exploring Corporate Strategy) define strategy as follows:


"Strategy is the direction and scope of an organisation over the long-term: which achieves advantage for the organisation through its configuration of resources within a challenging environment, to meet the needs of markets and to fulfil stakeholder expectations".

In other words, strategy is about:

* Where is the business trying to get to in the long-term (direction)
* Which markets should a business compete in and what kind of activities are involved in such markets? (markets; scope)
* How can the business perform better than the competition in those markets? (advantage)?
* What resources (skills, assets, finance, relationships, technical competence, facilities) are required in order to be able to compete? (resources)?
* What external, environmental factors affect the businesses' ability to compete? (environment)?
* What are the values and expectations of those who have power in and around the business? (stakeholders)

Strategy at Different Levels of a Business

Strategies exist at several levels in any organisation - ranging from the overall business (or group of businesses) through to individuals working in it.

Corporate Strategy - is concerned with the overall purpose and scope of the business to meet stakeholder expectations. This is a crucial level since it is heavily influenced by investors in the business and acts to guide strategic decision-making throughout the business. Corporate strategy is often stated explicitly in a "mission statement".

Business Unit Strategy - is concerned more with how a business competes successfully in a particular market. It concerns strategic decisions about choice of products, meeting needs of customers, gaining advantage over competitors, exploiting or creating new opportunities etc.

Operational Strategy - is concerned with how each part of the business is organised to deliver the corporate and business-unit level strategic direction. Operational strategy therefore focuses on issues of resources, processes, people etc.

How Strategy is Managed - Strategic Management

In its broadest sense, strategic management is about taking "strategic decisions" - decisions that answer the questions above.

In practice, a thorough strategic management process has three main components, shown in the figure below:

Strategic Analysis

This is all about the analysing the strength of businesses' position and understanding the important external factors that may influence that position. The process of Strategic Analysis can be assisted by a number of tools, including:

PEST Analysis - a technique for understanding the "environment" in which a business operates
Scenario Planning - a technique that builds various plausible views of possible futures for a business
Five Forces Analysis - a technique for identifying the forces which affect the level of competition in an industry
Market Segmentation - a technique which seeks to identify similarities and differences between groups of customers or users
Directional Policy Matrix - a technique which summarises the competitive strength of a businesses operations in specific markets
Competitor Analysis - a wide range of techniques and analysis that seeks to summarise a businesses' overall competitive position
Critical Success Factor Analysis - a technique to identify those areas in which a business must outperform the competition in order to succeed
SWOT Analysis - a useful summary technique for summarising the key issues arising from an assessment of a businesses "internal" position and "external" environmental influences.

Strategic Choice

This process involves understanding the nature of stakeholder expectations (the "ground rules"), identifying strategic options, and then evaluating and selecting strategic options.

Strategy Implementation

Often the hardest part. When a strategy has been analysed and selected, the task is then to translate it into organisational action.


'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

Knowledge and Power  (0) 2007.08.22
Proposals for Japan''s New Strategies  (0) 2007.08.10
Put Value Creation First  (2) 2007.07.23
Blue Ocean Stretegy by W.Chan Kim  (0) 2007.07.23
Information Aggregation Usage  (0) 2007.06.25

Put Value Creation First
(If You Want to Grow Your Way to Greatness)

Ken Favaro


"No company ever downsized its way to greatness." So goes the corporate mantra that emerged from the fatigue and disillusionment created by the reengineering and restructuring of the early Nineties. But no company ever grew its way to greatness either, without first learning how to make value creation 1 second nature to the entire organization. It has been shown time and again that putting growth first can destroy wealth at prodigious rates and, ironically, reduce a company's longer-term growth prospects. If you want to grow your way to greatness, put value creation first.



Companies That Put Value Creation First

Coca-Cola and Lloyds Bank are two examples from a handful of companies 2 that have made value creation drive their growth for over a decade. Enough time has now passed to observe the results and lessons.

Coca-Cola was perceived to be a good, if somewhat struggling, company facing an increasingly mature home market when Roberto Goizueta became CEO in 1980. Although it had achieved 14% annual revenue growth over the previous ten years, its profitability had eroded and its shares had severely underperformed its peers'. So at a worldwide management conference in April 1981, Goizueta decided to focus his entire organization on putting value creation first. This transformed the company. Since 1980 it has nearly doubled its market share to almost 50% and nearly tripled its return on equity to just under 60% in 1997. Today Coca-Cola calls its profitable growth opportunities "infinite," and Goizueta's successor, Doug Ivester, is still putting value creation first.

Lloyds Bank (now Lloyds TSB) was the smallest of the big four UK clearing banks when Brian Pitman became Chief Executive in 1983. At two critical Board meetings, he too decided to focus the entire company on putting value creation first 3. This led Lloyds down a very different path from its peers. Since 1983 it has nearly tripled its return on equity to well over 40% in 1997 while becoming the largest and fastest growing bank in the UK, if not the world. Today Lloyds' confidence that it can continue to deliver profitable growth has led it to declare a goal of doubling shareholder value every three years. Only a handful of companies worldwide - including Coca-Cola - have ever achieved this goal over a sustained period. Even fewer have had the courage to adopt it as their publicly stated ambition.

Coca-Cola and Lloyds are the dominant, most profitable and fastest growing players in their respective markets because they put value creation first, not growth or size. There are two main reasons for this.

Value Creation Tells You Where and How to Grow

Understanding where, how and why value is created within your company and your markets is the best, most objective way to identify which of your activities and assets are distinctive enough to provide a platform for sustainable and profitable growth.

By understanding value creation within their mix of businesses and within the entire beverage system, Coca-Cola's leaders discovered in the early 1980s that they were missing a major growth opportunity in their "mature" core business. This led them to significantly increase and refocus the company's marketing investment; to rapidly expand into new national markets; to acquire, consolidate and spin off bottling companies in order to create new, more powerful agents in their supply chain; and to reduce their participation in non-beverage businesses. In effect, they built a business model so distinctive that today they have an unassailable advantage in delivering superior profit growth.

Similarly, Lloyds' management began to understand better than its competitors where, how and why value is created in the financial services market. They subsequently developed a better capability than their competitors to identify and selectively participate in the most profitable segments. As a result, Lloyds was the first big UK bank to organize around customer segments, to invest heavily in retail insurance, investment and mortgage services, to selectively participate in corporate banking, to effectively withdraw from investment banking and, as Pitman says, to stop "planting flags around the world."

Coca-Cola, Lloyds and a handful of other companies have an advantage in deciding where and how to grow because they focus more intently than the competition on understanding the sources and drivers of value creation within their businesses and the broad markets in which they compete. This effectively gives them a better roadmap than their competitors for directing their capital and talent to the most profitable and sustainable growth opportunities.



Value Creation Gives You the Capital and Talent to Grow

Putting value creation first gives companies two advantages over their competitors in driving for profitable and sustainable growth: the first is capital and the second is talent.

Successful value creators never suffer from a capital shortage. They can either generate sufficient capital internally to meet their investment needs, or attract the capital they need from the markets, which never stop looking for profitable investment opportunities.

More importantly, though, companies that put value creation first will create over time a cadre of managers who have higher standards and better capabilities than the competition. In a world where nearly everyone faces abundant choices, the challenge for all businesses is to develop and sustain a uniquely attractive proposition for both customers and employees. But the hardest challenge is to do this in a way that also creates value. Holding your managers to this standard means continually asking, "What exactly do we do that's different from the competition, and how will this enable us to create value?" By instilling this discipline, you can make your people better managers and create an environment that attracts only people who adhere to the highest standards for business performance and personal achievement. In time this will give you more managerial talent than your competitors, enabling you to achieve higher levels of profitable and sustainable growth.

Coca-Cola, General Electric and the Walt Disney Company have enormous bench strength for staffing their growth opportunities with management talent. It is no coincidence that all three put value creation first, and are not only the most profitable players in their respective markets but also the fastest growing.

Value Creation Increases Your Capacity to Grow

To consistently put value creation first requires leadership skills, discipline and perseverance. Our experience suggests the following:

  • Be patient when it comes to growth, and impatient when it comes to creating value. Do not accept the criticism of "short-termism" -- turn it around: "the best way we can build our long-term growth potential is by putting value creation first."
  • Be better than your competitors at understanding where, how and why value is created and destroyed within your markets and your company. This means by business unit, by product, by customer, by channel, by market, by technology, or by whatever "cut" will best reveal the truly distinctive capabilities and assets you have to drive profitable and sustainable growth.
  • Share information widely within your management teams to build a shared sense of where you are good, bad and indifferent at creating value for customers and shareholders.
  • Promote, reward and celebrate managers who see growth as the outcome of a focus on value creation, and who consistently beat their competitors in creating value.
  • Demand a higher standard from managers who put forward growth strategies based on arguments for "patient money," cross-subsidization, "critical mass," economies of scale or market leadership. These are often substitutes for thinking harder about how to be profitably different from the competition. Remember:
    • It is human nature to underestimate the size of the (investment) hole and overestimate the size of the (profit) treasure.
    • Low-return businesses can only sustain high growth levels by building distinctive capabilities and assets that enable them to deliver high returns, sooner or later.
    • Cross-subsidization of products and services rarely pays.
    • Economies of scale, even in high-volume industries, are more likely the result of success than its precursor.
    • Market leadership means having the highest share of economic profit, not necessarily the highest share of volume, customers or capacity.

      Make clear to the organization that capital is plentiful but expensive, rather than scarce and free. Talent, on the other hand, is the scarcest resource of all: concentrate and develop it where growth is most likely to create value.
  • Talk about value creation as much as growth when exhorting the troops. If you talk about being "world class," talk about it in terms of value creation -- because if "world class" means anything, it means world class at creating value.
If you put value creation first in the right way, your managers will know where and how to grow; they will deploy capital better than your competitors; and they will develop more talent than your competition. This will give you an enormous advantage in building your company's ability to achieve profitable and long-lasting growth.

Ken Favaro


  1. Creating value means earning a return on capital that exceeds the cost of capital over time; or alternatively, it means earning a positive economic profit where revenue less expenses and a capital charge is greater than zero. At the operating level, value is created by selling a product or service to a customer for a price that more than covers all of your costs, including the cost of capital, to support that customer relationship.
  2. For more on companies that put value creation first, see "A Passion for Value," Marakon Commentary, Volume IV, Issue 3.
  3. For example, Lloyds was the first among its banking peers to adopt explicit standards for return on equity and economic profit at both the corporate and operating levels. For more on economic profit, see "Beyond Performance Measurement: The Use and Misuse of Economic Profit," Marakon Commentary, August 1994.

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

Proposals for Japan''s New Strategies  (0) 2007.08.10
Strategy - What is strategy?  (0) 2007.07.30
Blue Ocean Stretegy by W.Chan Kim  (0) 2007.07.23
Information Aggregation Usage  (0) 2007.06.25
5 steps to shortcut your success  (0) 2007.06.25

本質的な問題を発見できれば、問題解決の6合目まで到達できる!

「問題解決をしようと思ったら、本質的な問題を発見しないかぎり絶対にできない!」これは当コースのメイン講師である「斎藤顕一」氏が繰り返す言葉です。

問題解決のプロセスにおいて、「本質的な問題」を発見できれば、その6合目まで到達できたといえます。

本質的な問題の発見を怠り、目に見える現象一つ一つに対応をしても本質的な問題を解決しない限り、また似たような現象は発生します。

また本質的な問題を探る上でも、その過程に必要な基本的思考法を理解していなければ、本来未だ「仮説」レベルであるものを結論と思い込んでしまい、それに対する策を講じた結果、なんの解決も図られない、むしろマイナスになったということも残念ながら多いようです。

当コースでは、問題解決を進める上で最も重要かつ困難な作業である「本質的問題の発見(問題の本質を見抜く力)」に特にフォーカスします。

この「発見」を成功させるためには、論理思考(ロジカルシンキング)をはじめ多くのスキル修得が必要ですが、一連の講義と、それに伴う演習への取り組みによって、「知識」が「力」へと着実に変化するようトレーニングを積みます。

弊社のコースの中でも、受講前→受講後の変化が最も実感できると、多くの修了生から賛辞を頂いております。

Companies have long engaged in head-to-head competition in search of sustained, profitable growth. They have fought for competitive advantage, battled over market share, and struggled for differentiation.

Yet in today’s overcrowded industries, competing head-on results in nothing but a bloody “red ocean” of rivals fighting over a shrinking profit pool. In a book that challenges everything you thought you knew about the requirements fro strategic success, W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne contend that while most companies compete within such red oceans, this strategy is increasingly unlikely to create profitable growth in the future.


Based on a study of 150 strategic moves spanning more then a hundred years and thirty industries, Kim and Mauborgne argue that tomorrow’s leading companies will succeed not by battling competitors, but by creating “blue ocean” of uncontested market space ripe for growth. Such strategies moves—termed “value innovation”-create powerful leaps in value for both the firm and its buyers, rendering rivals obsolete and unleashing new demand.

Blue Ocean Strategyprovides a systematic approach to making the competition irrelevant. In this frame-changing book, Kim and Mauborgne present a proven analytical framework and the tools for successfully creating and capturing blue oceans. Examining a wide range of strategic moves across a host of industries, Blue Ocean Strategy highlights the six principles that every company can use to successfully formulate and execute blue ocean strategies. The six principles show how to reconstruct market boundaries, focus on the big picture, reach beyond existing demand, get the strategic sequence right, overcome organizational hurdles, and build execution into strategy.


Upending traditional thinking about strategy, this landmark book charts “a bold new path to winning the future”.

Kim and Mauborgne's blue ocean metaphor elegantly summarizes their vision of the kind of expanding, competitor-free markets that innovative companies can navigate. Unlike "red oceans," which are well explored and crowded with competitors, "blue oceans" represent "untapped market space" and the "opportunity for highly profitable growth." The only reason more big companies don't set sail for them, they suggest, is that "the dominant focus of strategy work over the past twenty-five years has been on competition-based red ocean strategies"-i.e., finding new ways to cut costs and grow revenue by taking away market share from the competition. With this groundbreaking book, Kim and Mauborgne-both professors at France's INSEAD, the second largest business school in the world-aim to repair that bias. Using dozens of examples-from Southwest Airlines and the Cirque du Soleil to Curves and Starbucks-they present the tools and frameworks they've developed specifically for the task of analyzing blue oceans. They urge companies to "value innovation" that focuses on "utility, price, and cost positions," to "create and capture new demand" and to "focus on the big picture, not the numbers." And while their heavyweight analytical tools may be of real use only to serious strategy planners, their overall vision will inspire entrepreneurs of all stripes, and most of their ideas are presented in a direct, jargon-free manner. Theirs is not the typical business management book's vague call to action; it is a precise, actionable plan for changing the way companies do business with one resounding piece of advice: swim for open waters.




About the Author
W. Chan Kim is The Boston Consulting Group Bruce D. Henderson Chair Professor of Strategy and International Management at INSEAD and an advisory member for the European Union. Renée Mauborgne is The INSEAD Distinguished Fellow and a professor of strategy and management and a Fellow of the World Economic Forum. Together, they have written for the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Financial Times, and their Harvard Business Review articles have sold over 500,000 reprints. They were selected for Thinkers 50, the global ranking of business thinkers, and The Sunday Times (London) called them “two of Europe’s brightest business thinkers…Kim and Mauborgne provide a sizeable challenge to the way managers think about and practice strategy.” They split their time between New York and Fontainebleau, France.

Companies have long engaged in head-to-head competition in search of sustained, profitable growth. They have fought for competitive advantage, battled over market share, and struggled for differentiation.

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

Strategy - What is strategy?  (0) 2007.07.30
Put Value Creation First  (2) 2007.07.23
Information Aggregation Usage  (0) 2007.06.25
5 steps to shortcut your success  (0) 2007.06.25
Email Marketing Strategy: Shortcuts to Success  (0) 2007.06.25

<Participants All Together Photo after Luncheon Seminar on June 29. 2007>

Information Aggregation Usage

Identifying business usage patterns provides an understanding of application utility both in the short and long term. This lets you better target the desired IT response. Here we classify the uses of the Information Aggregation pattern within a business according to business function. This can be used quickly to identify the user's requirements, the likely application or tool configuration, and the needed Application runtime pattern.

Business intelligence is applicable to all employees, partners, and customers of a company. Employees are usually given the most freedom of access. Partners and customers normally only access the data by pre-built Web business intelligence applications that, while offering business intelligence capability, restrict the user in scope of access and analysis.

Employees and internal users access data using a variety of data manipulation, query, and reporting tools. Often information is applied at a higher level within the company hierarchy, requiring custom-built applications providing information using EIS-like (Executive Information Systems) systems.

BI business usage fits into one of these categories:

  • Strategy and planning-oriented: Planning the company's strategy and operations.
  • Product-oriented: Managing brands or products.
  • Marketing-oriented: Discovering new and better markets for company products and services.
  • Sales-oriented: Improving the process of turning a lead into a sale according to the channel that handled the sale.
  • Service-oriented: Focusing on customer service, supplier management, and business support.
  • Process-oriented: Improving the internal business processes that run a company.

BI usage patterns details

The following BI topics contribute to roll-up information for executives, for example, as items on a balanced scorecard.

1. Strategy and planning-oriented

Use BI to plan the company's strategy and operations.

Characteristics:

User
business strategy planner, senior manager; usually internal use only
Delivery
report (for example, balanced scorecard and standard management reports) or analytical tool based.
Data
summary and detail business transaction reports organized by time, possibly with drill-through requirements to detailed data for event analysis; competitor data
BI role
analysis of trends; storing historical business details or trends; possibly data mining including risk analysis
Likely tool/application
OLAP tool; also traditional BI tools such as Brio, Business Objects, Cognos; (Also COBOL, Excel SAS); "Mart components": DataBase 2™ (DB2) (Universal DataBase (UDB), SP2, OS/390), Visual Warehouse

A typical analysis in this area would be:
Given the trends established from a set of queries previously performed against the warehouse, what will be the result if policy premium is increased for product X?
This type of query is usually performed on local (mart) data, as it often consists of "what if" type analysis in which data values are modified to perform the query. Because it is inappropriate to have users modifying data in a shared data warehouse, these queries are normally run on a local copy of the relevant data. The query tool usually makes this copy.

The actual tool used for business planning might be a specialized tool in which analysis and prediction models already exist. In many cases, this tool is a conventional spreadsheet application. The user imports data using the query tool and builds spreadsheets to show the results of varying business decisions.

Ideally, tools used for business planning are straightforward to use and shield the user from the physical data by using metadata.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis is a specialized form of the generalized business planning and querying process outlined above. This is a simple example of a statistical analysis question:

Taking a set of data on product sales performance, determine the statistical significance of the various factors thought to influence this performance and allow business decisions to be made on future modifications to these factors.

Many of the tools appropriate for query processing and business planning can also be considered for the purposes of statistical analysis, though their statistical functions and methods are fairly restricted. For example, the insurance industry uses sophisticated statistical methods to analyze product performance, underwriting performance, and so on. Certain vendors specialize in providing tools capable of handling both this level of complexity and the large volumes of data required as input to the analyses. Due to the complexity of the analysis, these specialized applications are used by highly skilled individuals. The user interfaces are less intuitive than those provided for more general analyses. SAS is an example of this kind of tool.

2. Product-oriented

Use of BI to perform brand or product management.

Characteristics:

User
business developer, product-competitiveness analyst (including actuarial rate-setting); usually internal use only
Delivery
report or visual tool based
Data
competitive product data; marketplace data; detail and summary business results
BI Role
analyze and manage large volumes of business data; perform various data mining activities
Likely tool/application
Relational Online Analytical Processing (ROLAP) tool; also traditional MI tools such as Brio, Business Objects, Cognos; (Also COBOL, Excel SAS); data mining tools; "Mart components": DB2 (UDB, SP2, 390), Visual Warehouse; IM4RM, FAMS, UPA
This is similar to the planning usage but based more on the business behavior of the brand or product set.
3. Marketing-oriented

Use BI to help the marketing department discover new and better markets for company products and services. It is also used to identify prospective customers, to contact those prospects, and to manage the marketing process to develop them into sales or retain them as future prospects. Divisions of responsibility between sales and marketing for this process can vary between companies.

Characteristics:

User
product marketing or external agent; an emerging trend is to push marketing materials to customers/ prospects through Internet e-mail
Delivery
reports, intranet, extranet, Internet
Data
product details; customer (and prospect) details; company details
BI Role
support campaigns (prospecting); manage large volumes of business data; store and relate relevant externally acquired data; provide data hand-off to sales; provide market segmentation analysis; maintain customer/prospect profile information
Likely tool/application
"Mart components": DB2 (UDB, SP2, 390), Visual Warehouse; applications/solutions: Valex, Insurance C&PO, IM4RM (data mining for customer segmentation)

Marketing leads can be distributed to external agents for follow-up (such as Independent Financial Advisors in the case of Financial Services). Materials can be pushed directly to customers/prospects, based on profiles that are partially defined by the customers and partially deduced/refined based on subsequent response patterns. New trends include using "click-mining" on company marketing Web sites to identify areas that appear to be of greatest interest to the public.

4. Sales-oriented

Use of BI to help improve the performance of the company's sales organization through superior analysis of the process of turning a lead into a sale, according to the channel handling the sale. As cross-selling increases, the need for sales support systems becomes increasingly critical because the "seller" might be trained primarily in customer service, for example.

Characteristics

User
internal or external sales agent (campaign or opportunity driven, using mail, telephone, in-person calls, email, and so on)
Delivery
reports, possibly through an intermittently-connected laptop, intranet, or extranet
Data
product details; customer details; company details; campaign details; competitive information; market information; summary business results; sales process data
BI Role
link from marketing, and provide above details; link to service
Likely tool/application
OLAP tool with drill-through; also traditional MI tools such as Brio, Business Objects, Cognos. (Also COBOL, Excel, SAS); data mining tools (for example, for propensity-to-buy analysis); DE for sales; "Mart components": DB2 (UDB, SP2, 390), Visual Warehouse

Marketing leads, created as above or otherwise acquired, are ideally followed by sales. Leads converted into sales are reported back to the sales department. Leads are assigned to different sales channels and effectiveness is measured. Then service BI measures the true value to the business of the items sold and the process used to do so.

5. Service-oriented

Use BI for customer service, supplier management, and business support.

Characteristics:

User
internal or external service agent (mail, telephone, or e-mail driven); increasingly the customer at home
Deliver
reports, intranet, extranet, Internet
Data
ODS; product details; customer details; company details
BI Role
provide consolidated client details
Likely tool/application
OLAP tool; also traditional MI tools such as Brio, Business Objects, Cognos; (Also COBOL, Excel, SAS); data mining tools; "Mart components": DB2 (UDB, SP2, 390), Visual Warehouse

Service-oriented BI recieves of the results of the marketing and sales area. It is usually the most process-oriented part of the business and has links to process BI. It performs activities such as order-tracking, guarantee-tracking, reponse to customer change requests, warehouse supply, and so on. Increasingly, the service center of the business is also expected to sell products and services.

6. Process-oriented

Use BI to improve the internal business processes that run a company.

Characteristics:

User
manager; usually for internal use only
Deliver
report (occasional and standard management reporting) or visual tool based
Data
workflow-type operational process measures; business and staff effectiveness measures
BI Role
storing historical details or summaries; possibly fraud detection mining; possibly risk management mining
Likely tool/application
traditional MI tools such as Brio, Business Objects, Cognos, and so on, with or without multi-dimensional facilities; (Also COBOL, SAS); "Mart components": DB2, (UDB, SP2, 390), Visual Warehouse

Such information is usually used by internal staff only and is predictable and stable after it is established. However, current trends to move customers to perform more self-service of their relationship with the business, and straight-through processing for lower services costs, will lead to greater flexibility and delivery demands on this pattern. This area can be difficult to distinguish from other department functions. If, for example, you are working with a marketing department, carefully distinguish between BI applications that improve marketing capabilities like Lead Generation (which do not fit in this category) from BI applications that improve the marketing process (detailed within this category). You might still implement a single solution for both problems. Process-oriented BI should consider the implications of the process on other departments that are affected by or involved in the complete business process. However, marketing (for example) also requires BI applications that are specific to the department's particular business activities. Process-oriented BI is designed and implemented best with a global perspective of the business process.

** の **
1.パクさんは日本語の先生です。
박씨는 일본어의 선생님입니다.
2.こちらは姉の美沙子です。
이쪽은 언니인 미사코입니다.
3.これは母の作ったカバンです。
이것은 엄마가 만든 가방입니다. (조사 が로 바꿀 수 있음)
4.あちらのにします。
저쪽 것으로 하겠습니다. (체언의 대용이므로 명사로 바꿀 수 있음)

** が **
1.赤ちゃんが部屋で寝ている。 
아기가 방에서 자고 있다.
2.彼女はきれいではないが優しい人です。
그녀는 예쁘지는 않지만, 상냥한 사람이다. (しかし의 의미)
3.彼は仕事がよくできて、ハンサムな人だ。
が、彼の傲慢な性格にはもう我慢できない。
그는 일도 잘 하고, 잘생긴 사람이다.
하지만, 그의 거만한 성격에는 더 이상 참을 수 없다. (접속사)
4.台風が来て、強い風も吹くが、雨も降る。
태풍이 와서, 강한 바람도 불고, 비도 내린다.
  (も、も의 형태로 연결할 때 연결할 때 쓰인다.)




이(異)문화 알기 캠페인!
′일본인의 독특한 언어습관 50′(1)
언어도 하나의 습관입니다. 일본어라는 전혀 다른 나라의 말을 공부한다는 것이 결코 쉬운 일은 아닐 것입니다. 일본어를 좀 더 쉽고 친근하게 공부하기 위해서는, 일본어라는 언어를 하나의 습관으로 인식하여 이해하고 학습하는 것이 큰 도움이 될 것입니다. 실제로 일본인과 커뮤니케이션을 하면서 맞닥뜨리게 되는 오해나 마찰도 결국 이(異)문화에 대한 이해 부족에서 현상이며, 서로가 불신하게 되는 가장 큰 이유가 되기도 할 것입니다.


A. 기본적인 대화술과 언어 습관
대화를 하다보면 어떻게 말을 꺼내야 할지, 어떻게 말을 끝내야 할지 모를 때가 많은데, 그런 가장 기본적인 대화술과 언어 습관에 대해 알아봅시다.

★말 꺼내기
1.「あのう」
상대방의 주의를 환기시키는데 가장 좋은 말이다. 가령, 「お仕事中, すみませんが…」(일하시는 데 죄송합니다만…)라는 말만하게 되면 다소 무례하게 들릴 수가 있지만, 앞에 「あのう」를 붙인다면 상대방의 관심을 끄는 데 효과적이며, 상대방에게 뭔가 요청을 할 때도 유용하다.

2. 「あなた」
우리말의 ′당신′과 마찬가지로 상대방에 대한 칭호를 「あなた」(당신)로 대신하면 실례가 된다. 가령, 이름을 모를 경우에는 「店員さん」(점원님), 등의 직업적인 호칭을 불러주면 된다.

★맞장구표현
3. 「はい」·「ええ」
「はい」(예)와 「ええ」(네)는 똑같은 긍정의 대답이지만, 고객이나 윗사람에게는 「ええ」를 쓰지 않는다. 가령 손님이 「ビ-ル, もう一本お願いします」(맥주 한 병 더 주세요)라고 했을 때는 반드시 「はい, 分かりました」(네, 알겠습니다)라고 해야 한다.

4. 「そうですか」·「そうですね」
「そうですか」(그래요?)의 뒷부분을 내려서 말하면 상대방이 주는 새로운 정보를 알았다는 뜻이 되고, 반대로 뒷부분을 올려서 말하면 상대방의 말에 대해 의심이나 실망을 나타내는 뜻이 된다. 또, 「そうですね」(그렇군요)는 보통 상대방의 말에 동의나 동감을 나타내는 표현이다. 단, 젊은 사람들은 「そうですか」 대신에 「本當(?)」(정말?), 「噓でしょう」(거짓말이겠죠, 설마요)라는 표현을 많이 쓴다.

★되묻기
5. 「あのう, すみません」
상대방의 말을 잘 못 알아들어 되물어야 할 때는 「あのう, すみません」(저, 죄송한데요)이라고 먼저 말하고 나서 묻는 것이 좋다.

6. 「今, 何と言ったんですか」
「今, 何と言ったんですか」(방금 뭐라고 했죠?)는 상대방의 말을 잘 못 알아들었을 때 다시 한 번 청해 듣는 표현이다. 한편, 윗사람한테는 「何とおっしゃったんですか」(뭐라고 하셨습니까?)라고 하면 된다. 더 정중하게 하려면 「あのう, すみません. よく聞き取れなかったんですが」(저, 미안합니다만 잘 못 알아들었는데요)라고 말한다.

★확인 방법
7. 「∼ですか」
식당에서 일을 할 때 주의할 사항인데, 「あのう, お冷やですか」(저, 찬물이세요?)라고 끝을 올리면 ′질문′이 되고, 끝을 내리면 ′저, 찬물 말이십니까?′하고 확인하는 표현이 된다.

★남의 행동이나 말을 중단시키는 방법
8. 「∼中にすみません」
남이 뭔가를 하고 있을 때 그것을 중단시키게 되면 자칫 무례를 범할 수가 있다. 그럴 때 유용하게 쓸 수 있는 표현이 「∼中にすみません」(∼하시는데 죄송합니다)이다. 가령 「會議中にすみません」(회의 중에 죄송합니다), 「お話中にすみません」(말씀 중에 죄송합니다), 「お仕事中にすみません」(일하시는데 죄송합니다)이라고 하면 OK. 단, 좀 더 정중하게 말할 때는 「おじゃましました」(실례 많았습니다)라고 한마디.

9. 「ええ, ちょっと…」
뭔가 대답하기 곤란한 질문을 받았을 때, 일본인은 어떻게 대답할까? 가령 「お出かけですか」(외출하세요?)라는 질문에 「ええ, ちょっと…」(네, 좀…)라는 한마디는 아주 무난한 표현.

★이야기를 끝내는 방법
10. 「これで失禮します」·「すみません, ∼ので」
사정이 있어 이야기를 끝내고자 할 때는 「では, これで」(그럼, 이만)나 「これで失禮します」(이만 실례하겠습니다) 정도의 표현이면 무난하다. 그러나 상대가 상사나 윗사람인 경우에는 「すみません, ∼ので…」(죄송합니다, ∼라서…)라고 「ので」를 사용하는 것이 좋다. 가령 「∼時まで會社に らなければならないので…」(∼시까지 회사로 돌아가야 해서요…) 등으로 말할 수 있을 것이다.

11. 「ゆっくりお話したかったんですが」
자, 이야기를 끝내면서 상대방에게 좀 더 세련되고 진한 여운을 줄 수 있는 정중한 한 마디가 무엇일까? 「ゆっくりお話したかったんですが」(천천히 이야기하고 싶었습니다만…) 혹은 「今度ゆっくりお話したいですが…」(다음 번엔 좀 더 천천히 이야기를 하고 싶은데요…)라는 표현이다.  


B. 의뢰표현 전언의 기술과 언어 습관
금전 차용의 의뢰, 보증인의 의뢰 등은 참으로 어려운 부탁인데요, 그보다 더 어려운 것은 그것을 거절하는 것입니다. 더구나 ′Yes′, ′No′가 분명치 않은 일본인에게는 더더욱 어려운 일이겠죠. ′Yes′, ′No′를 분명하게 표현하면 일본인들은 상대방을 차갑게 여기기 쉽습니다. 부드럽게 넘어가는 표현을 연구해 봅시다.


★일반적인 의뢰표현
12. 「∼てください」·「∼ていただけませんか」
남에게 무언가를 부탁하는 가장 일반적인 표현은 「∼てください」(∼해 주세요)이다. 그러나 가까운 사이라면 몰라도 「∼てください」를 윗사람에게 함부로 사용하는 것은 실례가 된다. 이때는 좀 더 정중하게 ′∼해 주시겠습니까?′의 뜻인 「∼てくださいませんか」나 「∼ていただけませんか」라는 표현이 적절하다.


★중요한 의뢰의 표현
13. 「折り入って」
금전의 차용이나 보증인의 의뢰 등, 매우 중요한 의뢰를 할 때 일본인은 어떤 표현을 쓸까? 바로「折り入って」(특별히, 각별히, 꼭)라는 말을 쓰는데, 반대로 평범한 일에는 절대 이 표현을 써서는 안 된다. 듣는 사람에게 상당히 부담을 주는 표현이기 때문이다.

14. 「お願いします」
일본에서는 중요한 의뢰는 전화나 만나서 하기 보다는 정중하게 편지로 한다. 편지에 부탁하는 사정을 조심스럽게 설명하면 그들과 좋은 관계를 유지하는 데 큰 도움이 된다. 또한 우리는 「お願いします」(부탁합니다)라는 말을 자주 사용하길 꺼리는 편이지만, 일본 사회에서는 무조건 이 말을 자주 해야 득이 된다.
「お願いできないでしょうか」(부탁할 수 없을까요?), 「お願いできないかと思いまして」(부탁을 드릴 수 없을까 해서요) 등의 표현이라면 좀 더 정중해 보인다.

★의뢰를 거절하는 표현
15. 「だめです」·「できません」
전 세계적으로 일본 사람만큼 확실하게 거절을 못하는 민족도 드물 것이다. 따라서 그들이 「だめです」·「できません」(안 됩니다)이라고 분명한 거절을 하지 않는다고 오해해서는 안 된다. 그들은 상대방이 상처받을 것을 염려해서 그런 표현을 안 하는 것뿐이다.

16. 「誠に申し譯ありませんが…」
 일본인의 「察しの文化」(남을 헤아리는 문화)는 매우 특징적인 것이어서 가령, 남의 부탁을 정중하게 거절할 때는 「私にお聲をかけてくださり, 本當にありがとうございます. しかし, 今, 私は他の仕事をかかえており, 誠に申し譯ありませんが…」(제게 말씀을 해 주셔서 정말 감사합니다. 하지만 지금 전 다른 일을 맡고 있어 대단히 죄송합니다만…)와 같은 식으로 상대방의 마음을 헤아리며 결국에는 거절을 하는 표현을 쓴다. 결코 No라고 말하지 않는다.

★전언을 부탁하는 표현
17. 「∼ように えてくれ」
남에게 전언을 부탁할 때는 「∼ように」(∼하도록)를 기본표현으로 쓴다. 가령 「金君に課長室に來るように えてくれ」(김 군에게 과장실로 오라고 전해 줘), 「∼に電話をしてくださいと えてください」(∼에게 전화를 해 달라고 전해 주세요), 등과 같이 다양하게 「∼と/∼ように」(∼라고/∼하도록)를 이용하여 전언을 부탁하는 표현을 만들 수 있다.

C. 권유 초대표현의 기술과 언어 습관
남에게 권유하거나 초대하는 것은 기본적으로는 같은 맥락이라고 할 수 있지만, 사소한 청에서부터 결혼식의 피로연과 같은 중요한 초대에 이르기까지 여러 가지 상황이 있을 수 있습니다. 이런 경우 일본인은 어떤 언어 습관을 가지고 있는지 알아보겠습니다.

★부탁 권유의 표현
18. 「今晩, 暇(?)」/「今晩, お忙しいですか」
남에게 부탁이나 권유를 하기 전에 말을 꺼내는 표현도 상대방에 따라 전혀 반대의 뉘앙스가 나올 수 있다. 가령 친구나 가까운 사람에게는 「今晩, 暇(?)」(오늘 밤, 한가해?)라고 물을 수도 있지만, 상대방이 상사나 윗사람일 경우에는 「今晩, ご都合はいかがですか」(오늘 밤 형편이 어떠세요?)나 「今晩, お忙しいですか」(오늘 밤, 바쁘신가요?)라고 묻는 것이 예의이다.

19. 「∼ましょうか(∼ませんか)」/「∼ですが, いかがですか」
남에게 뭔가를 권유를 할 때 가장 기본적으로 쓰는 표현이 「∼ましょう」(∼합시다, ∼해요), 「∼ましょうか」(∼할까요?)이다. 그런데 「∼ましょう」는 상대방이 권유를 받아들일 것이 당연할 경우에 확인하는 의미에서 쓰이는 말이고, 「∼ましょうか」는 상대방이 내 권유를 좋아할지 어떨지 확신이 없을 때 주로 쓰인다. 또 상대방이 윗사람일 경우에는 「∼んですが, いかがですか」(∼인데, 어떠세요?)라고 이유를 먼저 설명한 후 의중을 묻는 것이 좋다.

★초대표현 방법
20. 「結婚することになりました」·「結婚することにしました」
 일본인은 친한 사이에서는 「結婚することにした」(결혼하기로 했다)라고 표현하기도 하지만, 공식적인 결혼 피로연의 초대장에서는 집안과 집안이 인연을 맺는다는 중요한 의미를 갖고 있으므로 「結婚することになりました」(결혼하게 되었습니다)라고 표현한다.

21. 「∼に參加していただけなければ, パ-ティ-になりません」
일본에서는 파티 등에 꼭 참석해 주길 바라는 사람에게는 우선 초대장을 보내고 그 초대장이 도착할 무렵에 다시 전화로 초대한다. 그런데 초대한 사람이 오지 못하겠다고 할 경우에는 「∼さんに參加していただけなければ, パ-ティ-になりません. これは私たち一同からのお願いです」(∼씨께서 참석 못하시면 파티가 성립되지 않습니다. 이건 저희들 모두의 바람입니다) 등의 표현을 사용한다.

D. 사례 사과표현의 기술과 언어 습관
「ありがとう」(고마워요)라는 사례[감사]의 표현은 언제 들어도 기분 좋은 말입니다. 일본인은 이러한 사례표현을 여러 번 반목하는 언어 습관이 있습니다. 또, 「すみません」(미안합니다)이라는 표현도 빈번히 사용하지만, 이것이 꼭 자신의 잘못을 사과하는 표현이라고는 할 수 없고, 단지 습관적으로 남을 배려하는 말이라는 것을 알아둘 필요가 있습니다.

★감사를 표현하는 방법
22. 「先日はどうもありがとうございました)
남에게 초대를 받았거나 선물 등 뭔가 고마울 때는 그 자리에서 한 번, 나중에 다시 만났을 때 한 번, 반드시 두 번 이상은 고마움을 표시하는 게 일본인의 언어 습관이다. 가령 나중에 다시 만났을 때는 「先日はどうもありがとうございました)(일전에는 정말 감사했습니다)라는 표현을 하는 것은 그런 뜻에서이다. 가까운 사이라면 「この間はどうも)(지난번엔 고마웠어)라는 표현도 즐겨 쓴다.

★사과를 표현하는 방법
23. 「すみません)의 철학
많은 사람들이 자신이 뭔가 잘못했다고 느꼈을 때 그 자리에서 당장 사과하길 꺼리는 경향이 있다. 그러나 일본인들은 자신의 잘못은 물론, 설사 자신의 실수가 아닌 경우라도 뭔가 잘못이 있으면 우선 「すみません)(죄송합니다)이라고 사과를 한다. 그렇게 하면 혹시 있을지도 모를 상대방과의 마찰을 피할 수 있다고 여기기 때문이다.

24. 「∼から)/「∼ので)
우선 「∼から)와 「∼ので)의 근본적인 뜻의 차이를 알아보자. 「∼から)는 가령, 자신이 지각을 한 이유를 설명하면서 「JRで事故があったから遲れました)(JR에서 사고가 있었기 때문에 늦었습니다)라고 말한다면 이는 늦은 이유를 전부 JR의 사고에만 돌리는 뉘앙스가 있지만, 「JRで事故があったので遲れました)라고 표현한다면 같은 이야기라도 지신의 잘못도 인정한다는 뉘앙스를 전해 준다. 또, 좀 더 정중한 표현으로 「ので) 대신에 「もので)를 쓸 수도 있다.

25. 「知らなかったこととは言え, 誠に失 しました)
이 표현은 상대방이 어떤 사람인지 모르고 그만 실례가 되는 말을 사용했을 경우 정식으로 사과하는 표현이다. 「知らなかったこととは言え, 誠に失禮しました)(미처 몰랐다고는 하나 참으로 실례했습니다)를 통째로 외워두면 만일의 경우 유용하게 쓸 수 있을 것이다.

    재미있고 유익한 「言葉の由來)
*ご馳走-진수성찬
「馳走)는 「驅け回って客のために材料を える)(뛰어다니며 손님을 위해 재료를 준비한다)라는 뜻에서 생긴 말.

Modeling (not the ‘America’s Next Top Model‘ type!) is often called the shortcut to success, because it allows you to learn what’s worked from the best, and not have to spend as much time and effort as they did on trial and error. One way to do that is to find 3 people who are successful in the area you want to be and find out what they have in common.

The trick here is to look for patterns. A trait in 1 person might be a fluke, 2 might be a coincidence, but if it’s at least 3 you know something’s going on here. There’s where all these success principles & NLP techniques come from, they’re modeled after common beliefs and strategies of people who’ve been successful.

1) What do you want to excel in?

What’s one area in your life you want to make excellent? For example, I want to improve the way I write for this blog.

2) Find 3 people who are very successful in that area.

If you can’t find them in real life, you can find them through books, audio programs or the internet. Great sources of info would be stuff they wrote themselves, bios about them or interviews conducted with them.

For me, since I’m concerned about writing for my blog, I’d pick 3 very successful bloggers, Darren Rowse of Problogger, Steve Pavlina, and Signals vs. Noise (all very good reads)

3) Find what’s common about them.

This is where the brain-juice needs to kick in. What do they share in common? Look out for actions, beliefs, strategies, techniques.

Hmm ah…Steve’s telling us about the time he went to a Tony Robbins seminar, hmm interesting…so that’s what it’s like. OMG Darren’s poking fun at his baldiness, tee hee, I don’t know if I could ever do that (I’m not bald! I’m not bald! I’m just saying…). Wow Ryan at SvN’s sharing with us how he started his company…with actual figures! That’s pretty bold. But it makes for good reading.

Hmm, ah…what do all these things have in common? Hmm, Darren, Steve and Ryan are all sharing stuff from their own lives, they’re willing to be open and candid. Could this be it?

4) Test it out!

The most important step of all, take action on what you’ve learnt. This is the real juice behind modeling.

Perhaps I could be more open in my own blog. Focused as it is on self-development, maybe my writing would improve if I started sharing my own stories.

5) Refine

What did you learn from Step 4? What worked and what didn’t work as well for you? What could you learn from that to refine your strategy so it works even better for you?

Hmm, ah…reading back on my own post I think I still haven’t gotten the wind of this being personal thing…seems like I’m a bit long-winded :P Note to self: keep working on it. Use simpler language. Speak more directly like a real conversation rather than a lecture.

Avid learners do these steps naturally. You know, it’s like when there’s a new hobby or thingamajig you’re absolutely in love with. The kind of love that’ll make you go up to anybody who does what you love and ask ‘how do you do that?’, and take every opportunity to watch anybody who’s good at what you want to do with eyes and ears wide open, lapping up every little delicious tip you can find to improve your game. The difference is now you can do this consciously and in any other area of your life with directed modeling.

NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) has a great set of tools for modeling. Robert Dilts is the seminal NLP modeler, having written many great books on NLP modeling (Modeling With Nlp) and the results of modeling geniuses in their field (Strategies of Genius, Volume One, Volume Two, Volume Three, Tools for Dreamers: Strategies for Creativity, Alpha Leadership: Tools for Business Leaders Who Want More from Life).

Like I said in my Envision Success Like IBM Founder Tom Watson Sr, NLP gives you the tools that lets you know where and what you can model. You can model someone at the level of his actions (what I did with the blog writing), his skills, beliefs, identity, or even mission. If you want to go to that level, check out Robert Dilt’s stuff (he has a website at NLPU full of articles).

Email Marketing Strategy: Shortcuts to Success

Choosing Content Topics

Here's where all that spying you did on your competitors comes in handy. You know what communications they're sending -- use this knowledge to figure out how you can provide information that's even more valuable to your readers. If your competitors send a list of important events on a weekly basis, maybe you'll send a refined list daily. Where their articles are lacking in details, yours will be brimming with them. If there's an issue that they've missed, you'll snap it up and make it the focus of your newsletter.

There is one caveat to this advice, though: make sure that all your content is relevant to your readers. When deciding on the topics that you'd like to cover, keep your feet planted firmly in the shoes of your customers and prospects, and think about the kinds of articles that they'd like to read.

Once you've done all this, make a list of the topics you'd like to cover. Under each, develop a list of challenges, questions, and issues that relate to that topic. When you're happy with the list, source the relevant content from paid and free resources.

Sourcing Paid Content

It often makes sense to purchase content. However, becoming dependant on paid content can absorb a chunk of your budget and profits. Here are some tips on how to make the most of your paid content, along with some budget guidelines.

case studies
If you have a great customer success story, employing a professional writer to create a case study about it is definitely worthwhile. Creating the case study this way will allow you to mention or expand on the features, benefits, and advantages that you consider important. Unlike case studies written for magazines and other publications, this case study will be all yours: you'll own the copyright, so you can use it whenever you like without incurring any additional costs. If chosen carefully and written well, case studies can be timeless -- unless you change your product or service dramatically, it's unlikely that your case study will "expire." Even if it was no longer applicable, the case study could still serve as an historical success story -- another reason that makes it more than worth your while to get the piece professionally written.

articles
Most copywriters charge by the word for this type of writing, and fees can range between $0.50 and $1.00 per word; you pay for the number of words you end up using. When you commission this type of writing, you typically give the writer a guideline, such as "a 750-word article" or "a 2,000-word case study." It's difficult to go into much detail in less than 750 words (I have trouble writing less than 1,000 words when I'm writing articles), so allow $500 to $1000 -- possibly more -- per article. I don't recommend the use of paid articles unless you have a specific focus in mind that's particularly relevant to your product line, and a budget that allows you to commission articles of consistent quality.

reprints
Some publications and web sites will allow you to reprint their articles in your email newsletter for a fee that's usually based on the number of people who receive your newsletter, and your business goal. Educational or non-profit uses of the article will usually incur a more reasonable rate than reproductions made for commercial gain. Rates vary widely, depending on the publication or web site from which you source the content. For details, check the publication's permissions or reprint policy.

article harvesting
Certain companies will, for a fee, sift through the content of publications, web sites, and databases to pull out articles that suit your topics and readership. If you use the blurbs of these articles in your newsletters and allow your readers to click through to the original source for the full version, you can use these articles for free (you're still paying the finder's fee, though). It's a hit-and-miss approach that I've seen generate good and bad results. You'll likely have more luck if your topics are very specific, but the amount of experience the researchers have with your topic plays a big part, too. I've seen such organizations charge anywhere from $1,000 to $5,000 per issue to find content for an email newsletter, though this cost usually includes the copy, design, programming, and mailing of your email. We'll look at these points further in the section called "Setting your Budget" later in this chapter.

Sourcing Free Content

There is high-quality, free content out there -- it just takes a little more time to find and manage than does paid content. Here's some of the best sources of free content:

your employees
Having your employees write articles about hot industry topics, an interesting aspect of your organization, or even their personal hobbies or interests can make for great reading that personalizes both your newsletter and your organization. Just make sure that the article isn't a sales pitch!

industry experts
A lot of industry experts, such as consultants and small business owners, will be happy to write articles for you -- after all, inclusion of their articles in your newsletters will only help to boost their profiles. These types of relationships can be very synergistic as long as the experts you use aren't in direct competition with your business, and their articles are relevant and offer tips that your readers can implement themselves. Obviously, you don't want any 750-word pitches on why your clients need to hire these writers or their companies!

customers
The biggest obstacle in getting customers to write for you is working out what they'll actually write. Usually, the more defined the topic, the better the results will be. Here are some suggestions:

  • Ask a customer who's planning to attend an upcoming industry conference to write an article on one of the sessions.
  • Ask customers to write about how they addressed the biggest challenges they faced in the last year.
  • Have your customers write success stories about their innovations, such as marketing campaigns that went particularly well, new management styles that increase the efficiency of their organizations, or cost-cutting strategies that have helped boost their bottom lines.

interviews
Interviews are always interesting to read, and if you interview an industry expert, you'll be killing two birds with one stone. Most experts will be happy to chat with you free of charge, especially if they can approve the article before its publication. You might even conduct the interview over email, giving the interviewee time to think about the questions and craft the answers. This approach also saves you from taking notes or transcribing recordings of your conversations.

royalty-free article farms
A growing number of web sites are devoted to providing articles that can be reprinted for free, as long as you reference the author and include that person's basic biography and contact information. While I've never had much luck with these kinds of services (too often I find that the articles are thinly veiled advertisements for the writers), with a bit of time and research you may find relevant articles that are well-suited to your purpose.

repurposing your own content
For publishing companies, this is an obvious way to generate content. For example, SitePoint often uses chapters from its newly released books as feature articles on the sitepoint.com site. The same approach can be used with email, especially if your mailout will reach prospects, rather than customers. Include as much information as you need to make your article interesting, but don't include so much that there's no need for recipients to subscribe. Of course, you can use this model even if your organization isn't a publishing company -- if you've created content for customers (white papers, newsletters, and so on), consider reusing it in communications with your prospects.

aggregating the content of others
Sometimes the whole is worth more than the sum of its parts. By combining articles, market research, surveys, and other content on a single topic from a variety of sources, you can increase the overall value of your mailout. You'll also save your readers time by providing everything they need in a single package. Just be sure to respect any copyright laws or requirements of the authors. In most cases, you won't be able to reprint the full text of articles written by others, but you may be able to include the first few sentences or write a brief blurb, and provide a link to the full text of the original article.

polls and surveys
People are always interested in what others think, and in terms of content, polls and surveys are extremely versatile. A simple poll -- one that poses an industry question with a few multiple choice answers, and shows readers how their responses compare with those of others -- could make a great regular content item. The results of a survey that includes both open-ended and multiple-choice questions could easily warrant analysis in a stand-alone article.

short tips and quotes
Tips and quotes can be the sole content items included in short-form editorial emails, or they may be slotted in as a piece of a complete email newsletter (similar to the regular poll item suggested above). If you make your tips actionable, include a source, and possibly offer a link to a third-party site for more information, your readers will love them! These tips can be prepared in advance and dropped into your email as necessary. Of course, you can prepare quotes in the same way, but make sure that the quotes you use are relevant to your topic of interest and to your readers.

barter
There's nothing wrong with doing things the old-fashioned way and, as the saying goes, "one good turn deserves another." Maybe you can offer that web hosting client of yours -- the one who happens to be a freelance writer -- free hosting in return for a certain number of articles each month.

Pulling it all Together

When you've decided on your likely content sources, grab the topic list that you created earlier, and add the specifics of these sources to it. Make the list as comprehensive as possible -- have a look at Example 3.5, "Content strategy for Congressional Publications's mailouts". Having your list to refer to throughout the coming months as you create your newsletter will make it much easier to get your strategy off the ground.

Example 3.5. Content strategy for Congressional Publications's mailouts

promotional email topics

  • weekly magazine: features, benefits, and cost
  • daily magazine: features, benefits, and cost
  • online service/paid web site: features, benefits, and cost

relationship-building emails -- topics and sources

  • upcoming congressional events and votes: repurpose from daily magazine
  • opinion columns: repurpose from weekly magazine
  • brief interviews with congressmen/lobbyists: completed via email by reporters
  • pro/con article pairs on key legislation: guest columns written by lobbyists

How Often should I Send Mailouts?

One of the top five most frequently asked questions in email marketing today is: "How frequently should I send mailouts?" Often when you ask this, what you're really wondering is, "How often can I throw email promotions at my customers before they get angry and stop reading?" I wish there were a standard answer for this, such as "Oh, that's easy: three times a month," but, unfortunately, no such answer exists.

Mailout frequency varies widely between organizations, as demonstrated by the results of a 2005 survey that asked how often companies sent emails to their lists ("Email Marketing Metrics Guide," MarketingSherpa, October 2005.):

  • 39% reported sending one email or less per quarter
  • 32% said they sent mail monthly
  • 18% contacted their readers two or three times a month
  • 8% followed a weekly mailing schedule
  • 4% of those surveyed sent more than one email a week

Frequency has the potential to make or break your email efforts. In a recent survey, 58% of consumer respondents said that they considered email that came too frequently to be spam, even if the sender was a business with which they had a working relationship ("DoubleClick's Sixth Annual Consumer Email Study," DoubleClick, December 2005). So, where's the sweet spot? What sort of mailout frequency is effective without being too much? You'll need to consider a range of factors to get the timing of your mailouts just right.

Type of Content

Recipients tend to be more tolerant of good editorial content than they are of emails that contain only promotional material. As such, email newsletters that combine editorial and promotional content can usually be sent more frequently than can straight promotional emails.

Length of Content

Longer emails take more time to read, and require more commitment from the recipient, than shorter emails. So, unless you have a very loyal following, you might want to temper the frequency of long emails. You'd probably get away with sending shorter emails, such as a "Tip of the Day" or similar, more frequently.

Resources

Resources are a critical factor in determining the frequency of your mailouts. It's better to send an email with great content less frequently than it is to send a mediocre email twice a week. Make a realistic determination of how much exceptional content your organization can produce, and use this as the primary determinant of the mailout's frequency. If you can only provide one mind-blowing article a month, send monthly. If you feel you have the resources to produce ten to 14 masterpieces a month, send your newsletter every other day. When in doubt, scale back -- you can always increase your frequency later.

Seasonality

You may need to vary the frequency of your mailout in accordance with seasons. We saw an example of this in the Dakin Farm case study in Chapter 1, Why Use Email Marketing? While Dakin Farm sent an average of three emails a month, the organization sent five emails during December, as its products made great Christmas gifts, and less frequently in the spring, when demand for the farm's products was low.

If there's a seasonal element to your product offerings, consider it as you set your email schedule.

Length of Sales Cycle

The length of your product's sales cycle is another factor that should impact on the frequency with which you send. Is your product purchased on impulse, or will your customers need to conduct research before they decide to buy? Is it a low-cost product, or will your customers need to get a budget approved before they can commit to the purchase?

If your product has a long sales cycle, you might consider developing an email campaign that helps readers move through the cycle step by step, and sending those emails reasonably frequently. For instance, you might create an informative newsletter that educates readers, moving them toward a purchase, and mail it once a week. This email would likely perform -- and be tolerated -- better than a weekly "buy our product today" email that supported a low-cost service.

Competition

Let's not forget about the competition. If your competitors are sending email once a week, will you be able to match their efforts effectively with an email dispatch every three days? Probably not. While this shouldn't be the only factor in your decision, it is an important point to consider. Sending more frequently than your competitors won't necessarily give your email newsletter greater appeal -- the factors that will achieve this are the distinguishing elements of your newsletter and the outstanding content that it provides. You may even be able to match or surpass a competitor's mediocre weekly email with an absolutely fabulous email that's sent every other week, or even monthly.

Here's an example: in the competitive analysis we conducted for the Digest of Congress, we identified an email frequency of twice a week: one mailing was editorial, the other promotional. These emails were sent on Tuesday and Thursday, respectively. If we wanted to match Digest of Congress's frequency, we'd shift our schedule so that our emails were sent one day ahead, scooping the news and opinion features in its email newsletter. We'd also add a short-form editorial segment to our Friday newsletter to help our readers schedule the coming week, and plan to send additional short-form editorials as needed -- for example, we might report on close votes as quickly as possible.

I used parameters such as these to put together the sample mailout plan shown in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4. Sample frequency and timing for Congressional Publications' mailout plan
1561_table4 (click to view image)

This is just the beginning! I could blow the competition away by publishing a value-packed short-form editorial piece every day, or take advantage of my daily publication schedule to send a brief overview of upcoming key events (not too many, though). All of this would allow me to create an email newsletter program that's appealing to my audience and better than those of my competitors.

Audience

Who are you sending the email to, and how much time do readers have to devote to your emails? A recipient who spends all day in front of the computer is more likely to read your emails than a recipient who doesn't. You don't want your emails to pile up; sending a daily email to a readership that only checks their emails once or twice a week isn't a good strategy.

List Fatigue

If your open and clickthrough rates decrease over time, you may be mailing too frequently. To head this possibility off at the pass, perform an analysis to see what you can learn about the ways in which readers use your email. If the average reader only opens and reads your daily email once a week, you should think about mailing weekly. On the other hand, if you find that your open rates on monthly mailouts are high compared to the industry average, it could be because your audience want to hear more from you.

Timeliness

Our world has a 24-hour news cycle. Most of the stories that appear in the morning news summary email I receive were posted on the publisher's web site the evening before. By the time that summary arrives, the news is stale. This situation should be avoided at all costs, and two tactics, in particular, can help you handle it. The first option is to email more frequently the information that's likely to date quickly The second solution is to develop your content strategy to avoid the most time-sensitive material. This approach will give you a more relaxed publishing schedule, but be careful to ensure that taking this path doesn't lower the value of the content that you do include so that your email becomes irrelevant to your readers.

Relevance

In general, the more relevant readers find your information, the more often they'll want to receive it. However, be wary of the fact that relevance is in the eye of the beholder -- just because you feel the information is relevant and warrants a daily or twice-daily send doesn't mean that your readers will feel the same way.

Letting Readers Choose

Back in the early days of email marketing, it was seen as good practice to allow your readers to select the frequency with which they wanted to receive your mailouts, but this is no longer the case. While that approach did give readers more control, it added complexity to the mail schedule and created more work for the organizations who sent the emails. Personally, rather than giving my readers a choice, I prefer to inform prospects of the frequency with which I mail, and let them use this information to make their opt-in decision.

How often should you send email, then? You should send as often as you need to, and no more than you have to. Don't expect to find the ideal mailing frequency without trial and error. It will constantly ebb and flow in accordance with internal and external factors, but in time, you should be able to find a happy medium for your mailing schedule, and even anticipate changes in readers' needs.

The Best Day to Send

You've probably heard about studies that have shown -- conclusively! -- the best day and time to send your email. It used to be that Mondays and Fridays were forbidden: supposedly, no one read email on those days. Then, a new study showed that Monday was actually the best day to send, and Friday wasn't so bad either. In this study, Wednesdays and Thursdays were the worst days of the week to send ("eROI mail statistics for Q2 '04," eROI, July 2004.).

So, am I recommending that you send your mailouts on Mondays, at least until the next study comes out? No. As with all third-party data, the results presented here may or may not apply to you and your audience. There's no perfect day to send.

If you're just starting out, I suggest you pick a day -- any day. If you have relevant information about your audience, use it to help you decide which day might be best. For instance, many chefs have Monday off, so if you're trying to reach them at work (provided that they have a computer in the kitchen or some sort of access to email), you probably shouldn't send your message on a Monday. If you're trying to reach office workers during business hours, you'd probably choose not to mail on Saturdays and Sundays.

Once you've narrowed the week to specific days that might suit, test to find the best day for your mailout. Testing is a relatively simple procedure: send to half your list on your regular mailing day (say, Monday), then send to the other half of the list on a different day (say, Tuesday). Now, look at your metrics. Be sure to review all your metrics -- opens, clickthroughs, orders generated, dollars generated, etc. -- as you identify the winning day. You can keep performing tests, pitting the winning days against other days, until you have a definitive winner.

Once you have identified the best day to send, it's a good idea to re-test it once in a while. One thing that those "best day to send" studies do show is that things change. This year, Tuesdays might be great for you, but when you run a test next year, you may find that Thursdays are really where it's at. Be prepared to test, and be prepared to move with your audience's needs and preferences.

Although it's important to spend some time thinking about this issue, don't get too wrapped up in finding the best day to send. After all, one of the great things about the Internet is that it's global. If you're sending email to people around the world, when it's Monday for you, it could be Tuesday for at least some of your readers. Will that make or break your campaign's success? I don't think so! It's good to put some effort into identifying the days on which your readers may be more disposed to reading your mail, but don't obsess over it.

The Best Time to Send

As with the thorny proposition of finding a best day to send, there's no single answer to the question, "What's the best time to send?" Again, it's good to test. That said, you need to come up with a time for your very first send, and the best way to do that is to think the process through.

If I'm looking to reach business people, I try to land my email in their inbox during business hours. If I'm sending to multiple time zones, I work to find a window in which business is underway in all zones. For example, if you're mailing to people across the US, you'd want to send between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. EST, which is 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on the west coast. This is a window in which business people on both US coasts (and everyone in between) tend to be in their offices.

I avoid sending email outside business hours. I know what my email inbox looks like first thing in the morning -- it's full of junk mail. I end up hitting Delete a lot, and sometimes I actually make the mistake of deleting emails that I want to read. I know I'm not the only one who makes this mistake, and as I don't want to see the email I send mixed in with spam, nor see recipients delete it accidentally, I mail when I expect that recipients are likely to be at their computers.

Perhaps you want to send before business hours, so that your email's waiting for readers when they check their inboxes first thing in the morning. This time is fine, but be sure to keep an eye on your metrics. If they're just as good when you send at 2:00 a.m. as they are when you send at 2:00 p.m., it's fine; if they aren't, you might consider changing your schedule.

Let's do Lunch
I often try to think about when my recipients will have time to read my email newsletter. Ideally, I want them to have a spare moment to look at it as soon as it arrives. With some email newsletters (especially the ones that contain industry news), I've found that mailing just before lunch time works very well. My theory is that many people eat at their desks and want to read something as they do so; an industry newsletter is enough like work to be acceptable to your superiors if they catch you reading it, but not so much like work that you feel like you're sacrificing your lunch break to read it.

Defining your Quantitative Goals

By now, you should have some qualitative guidelines for your email marketing strategy: which products or services you're going to market, who you're going to market them to, what actions you're hoping to convince recipients to take, what types of email you're going to use to present your message, and so on. The next step is to put some quantitative goals behind these guidelines.

Quantitative goals need to be relevant, measurable, and realistically achievable. They should measure factors that directly affect the success or failure of your business. You'll likely have a number of different goals, so be prepared to prioritize them. When I think of quantitative goals, I separate them into two types: bottom-line goals and means-to-an-end goals.

Bottom-line Goals

Bottom-line goals should correlate directly with your overall measures of success. They're often expressed in terms of units sold or dollars generated. Total revenue generated, revenue generated per dollar spent, and profitability are all examples of bottom-line goals. These goals are your top priorities -- the ones that you need to hit to get your bonus or keep the company afloat.

Some examples of common bottom-line goals include:

  • achieving renewals from a certain percentage of your current customers
  • upselling a set number of current customers
  • cross-selling a certain quantity or dollar amount of your product or service
  • having a certain percentage of your customers refer your business to their colleagues
  • acquiring a certain number of new customers or new sales
  • generating a set number of qualified leads
  • creating awareness of your brand in a set percentage of your target audience
  • achieving a given number of articles, quotes or other media mentions
  • generating a certain amount of advertising revenue

Do these goals sound familiar? That's right: we're just taking the qualitative goals we defined earlier and putting some numbers, or quantitative goals, against them.

Means-to-an-end Goals

Means-to-an-end goals are objectives that you believe you need to hit to meet your bottom-line goals. Here are some examples of common means-to-an-end goals:

  • achieving an average delivery rate of n%
  • achieving an average unique open rate of n%
  • achieving an average clickthrough rate of n%
  • converting n% of clicks to sales
  • growing your list by n%, or to a certain level

In general, if you miss all your bottom-line goals but meet all your means-to-an-end goals, you probably didn't have a successful year in the eyes of the company (although you may have positioned yourself to do very well the following year). But if you miss all your means-to-an-end goals and achieve all your bottom-line goals, you're probably doing fine (although you'll want to try to meet the means-to-an-ends goals the following year, when you'll need them in order to meet your much higher bottom-line goals, adjusted upwards because of your success).

Measuring your Performance
I've seen many email marketers face tough decisions when their performance plans are tied too closely to means-to-an-end goals.

For instance, one marketing director's bonus was based on list growth and the quantity of emails sent. As a result, even though a large segment of the list was non-responsive (that is, they hadn't responded in any way in a year or more), he was hesitant to stop mailing them. While it would have saved the company money and improved his metrics, it would have jeopardized his bonus. Instead, he spent a lot of the company's time and money trying, in vain, to get these customers to respond -- money that, in the long run, would have been better spent in attracting new opt-ins to the list.

Benchmarks

The hardest thing about quantitative goals is coming up with the numbers. To some extent, if you've never done any email marketing before, you really are just guessing.

Benchmarks can help reduce that guesswork. A benchmark is a guideline that you can use to come up with an intelligent guess for your own quantitative goals. I collect benchmarks. I pull them from email marketing campaigns I've executed myself, but I also get them from articles, case studies, and other third-party sources. Benchmark collecting is a useful hobby -- let me explain how it's done.

If you've done email marketing in the past, your results from those exercises should be your first stop for benchmark data on bottom-line and means-to-an-end goals. I usually create a spreadsheet in which each past email marketing campaign has its own row, and each quantitative goal or metric has its own column. Then I go through the spreadsheet and fill in the data I've collected for each campaign. If you don't have any past experience with email marketing, don't worry -- we're not done yet!

Benchmarks can also be garnered from the quantitative results of other marketing activities you've undertaken. Even if it's an estimate (e.g. "it seems like I close about one out of every three leads that come in"), write it down. I list other marketing initiatives -- one per row -- under the email marketing efforts I detailed in my spreadsheet, filling in any of the metric columns that I can.

Next, look for third-party goals or metrics. One of the most readily available sources of third-party benchmarks is the case studies that are published by so many industry magazines, newsletters, and web sites. Don't wait until you need metrics to begin looking for case studies, though -- collect them in your daily rounds of the Web. I look for case studies on a regular basis, all year long. When I find one that's relevant and contains good metrics, I file it either on my computer or print it out. One of my favorite sources is MarketingSherpa -- its case studies are usually heavy with quantitative metrics.

Another resource is special reports. A number of publishers -- MarketingSherpa among them -- publish annual metrics guides that aggregate figures from case studies, surveys, and other sources. They often cost a couple of hundred dollars, but you'll be glad you spent that money when you write a marketing plan or email strategy.

Many email service providers (ESPs) also publish benchmarks (mostly means-to-an-end benchmarks, but sometimes bottom-line figures) that can be useful. Some offer the data only to paying clients. Others offer a full report to clients and a summary to everyone else -- DoubleClick is the most notable example. DoubleClick's reports are quarterly; the free summary is about four pages but it's broken into analyses of six or eight industry segments, which are very useful.

Articles will often give you facts and figures that you can use to develop benchmarks for your product. Many industry publications have "success stories" with metrics that you can add to your spreadsheet.

Finally, your colleagues can be source of benchmark data. Maybe you have a sister company whose marketing director would be willing to swap metrics with you. Or maybe you've a personal friend in a non-competitive organization in your industry, and that person's willing to do a swap (be careful in this case: some companies have policies against sharing any data with outside sources). If you don't personally know anyone who's able to help you, you might post your benchmark query to a forum, discussion board, or distribution list. Many marketers are comfortable sharing figures in these types of venues. Be warned, though: there's nothing better than finding out that your email marketing programs outperform those of others, and nothing worse than finding out they're not as successful!

If you're able to gather a significant number of benchmarks, you'll likely start to see trends and patterns in the data. Maybe most of the open rate figures fall in the 35% to 50% range; perhaps renewals rarely top 80%, but don't usually fall lower than 60%. If you can get to this point, great! Look at these trends and set your own goals accordingly. If you don't get to this point, that's okay too. You still have some figures to use as a starting point.

A final note on benchmarks: they're fairly controversial. There's a school of thought that contends that figures produced from a totally different source cannot be relevant to your situation -- your product, audience, and qualitative goals are unique, so why would any other numbers fit your plan?

I agree with this argument to some extent. If your email marketing is profitable for you, that's the main thing. But we all need something to shoot for -- a place to start. Benchmarks provide that launchpad.

Benchmarks to Get you Started
Table 3.5, "Benchmarks from DoubleClick's Q4 2004 Email Trend Report" presents some aggregate figures from DoubleClick's "Q4 2004 Email Trend Report" to get your benchmarking and goal-setting under way ("DoubleClick Q4 2004 Email Trend Report," DoubleClick, Inc., March 2005.).

Table 3.5. Benchmarks from DoubleClick's Q4 2004 Email Trend Report
1561_table5 (click to view image)

Setting Quantitative Goals

The benchmarking process should provide you with some guidelines to use as you set quantitative goals. Now it's time to look at the benchmarks you've found, add your own personal knowledge -- and a heavy dose of gut instinct -- and choose some specific quantitative goals for your program.

You can approach this in one of two ways: set some bottom-line goals for your email marketing strategy and work backward, or fill in some means-to-an-end goals and work forward. I prefer the second option, because I can usually set some means-to-an-end goals with which I feel comfortable as a result of the benchmarking process. Also, if the bottom-line goals aren't what I expected, I can always go back and adjust the means-to-an-end goals accordingly to make the numbers work.

In Table 3.6 and Table 3.7, I've pulled in the benchmarks presented in Table 3.5, and set some goals based on a scenario in which Congressional Publications sends monthly emails to 10,000 addresses.

Table 3.6. Means-to-an-end goals for Congressional Publications
1561_table6 (click to view image)

Table 3.7. Bottom-line goals for Congressional Publications
(click to view image)

As you can see, we have two benchmarks that relate to the number of orders generated, and three that relate to revenue generated. Here's where your knowledge and gut instinct come into play. You need to sanity-check each of these numbers and choose the one that you think you're most likely to achieve. I usually lean toward a mid-range figure. Remember, this is just a starting point. You can adjust these figures up or down after you have a few sends and some actual results under your belt.

This part of the strategic process can feel a little like a jigsaw puzzle. You collect the pieces (benchmarks and data) from various sources, then try to fit them together in a logical way. It may take a few tries to come up with something that you're comfortable with. Don't get frustrated -- just keep working with the pieces until they feel right.

Setting your Budget

Once you have what feels like a workable set of bottom-line and means-to-an-end goals, it's time to look at the budget that you'll need to achieve them. As with goal-setting, this process may take some time and effort, and you may end up adjusting your bottom-line goals in order to stay within your budget. Don't worry -- this is normal. Just keep working on this process until you have a plan that you can implement.

Defining your Costs

Email marketing can be cost-effective, but it's not free. Here are some of the common expenses that are associated with it, along with some very rough estimates of costs.

Creative: Copywriting

Creative costs include copywriting and design. If you already have people on staff to handle these tasks, there may not be any incremental cost associated with the emails' production. But if you don't, you'll have to factor them in.

A number of different pricing models are used by copywriters. As I mentioned earlier, some want to be paid by the word, some charge an hourly rate, and some will give you a flat rate per email. There's no right or wrong way to pay for copy, and if you're working with copywriters outside of your company, you usually won't have a choice, as the writers will decide how they charge. Work to get the best copy that you can afford within your budget.

Here are some going rates for copywriters; you can use these as rough guidelines:

  • $0.50 to $1.00 per word
  • $75 to $125 per hour
  • $350 to $700 per one-page email

I've heard of people who want to pay copywriters on a commission basis, the idea being that writers will receive nothing up front, but instead receive a percentage of the sales their copy generates. I don't know of any copywriters who are willing to do this. It's not that they don't have faith in their own work, but that so much of what makes or breaks an email campaign is beyond their control. Something as small as sending the email at a bad time can decrease the response rate, and a list that's not as targeted as you thought can totally bomb, even with the best copy in the world.

There are also copywriters who will demand a high up-front fee as well as either a small bounty for each email you send, a commission on the revenues their copy generates, or both. Unless you're a well-established company, it's probably best to steer clear of this model. If you think that the copywriter's expertise will generate sales that greatly exceed the price that they're asking for, it may work. But for most companies -- particularly those new to email marketing -- it's a losing proposition.

I prefer to pay copywriters a flat rate, based on the $350 to $700 quote above. Additional pages, if I have them, should be billed at a lower rate. This gives me a fixed number to put into my budget spreadsheet, and provides insurance against cost overruns in this area.

Can you write the copy for your emails yourself? Of course. And this isn't a bad way to get started. It's very cost-effective -- you don't have to set aside any budget for copy. You may get to a point, though, where you want to take your email marketing to the next level, and purchasing professional copy skills may be the most cost-effective way to lift your emails' response rates.

Creative: Design

If you're sending text-only emails, you may be able to forgo design costs. However, I don't recommend this approach. Design doesn't have to be elaborate; something as small as a company logo, some bolded terms, color, and formatting (none of which you have with plain text) can add to readability and boost response rates. If you have a staff member who can design your email in-house, that's another bonus for your budgeting, and you can jump ahead to writing the HTML.

Good design doesn't have to be expensive. The costs are similar to those for good copy, and many times, the person who designs your email will also code the HTML for it at the same cost. I think it's worth having the email professionally designed even if you decide not to spring for professional copy.

Here are some cost guidelines for design:

  • $75 to $150 per hour
  • $100 to $500 per one-page email

You'll pay a little more if you want to review a few designs and choose one of them, but generally a single, simple design will serve your purposes. More elaborate designs will incur a higher cost, which is why the range of the per-email price given above is so large.

Some email service providers will create an HTML template for you, or provide you with a tool to create your own templates. Once you've created the template, you can reuse it for different emails simply by replacing the copy and images. The service provider may charge a one-time fee for this, or it may be included in your setup costs. This can be an extremely cost-effective approach, especially if you're just starting out. Not only does it eliminate the design cost for each send, but it also covers your programming cost, since the templates are already in HTML.

Writing the HTML

If you're sending HTML, you'll need someone who can convert your design into HTML. As with the copy and design tasks, if you have someone who can code the email in-house, you're off the hook cost-wise.

A word of caution: the programs in which your recipients will read their emails are much more sensitive than web browsers. So something that looks great in Internet Explorer or Firefox may lose its integrity in Outlook, Gmail, or Yahoo! Mail. This is one reason to use an email service provider who provides you with an HTML template, as most are familiar with the differences and know how to program email so that it displays well in most, if not all, email clients. If you're using a programmer to write your HTML, employ one who's familiar with coding HTML for email.

Programming tends to be a bit less expensive than copywriting or design. Here are some ballpark estimates of programming costs:

  • $40 to $75 per hour
  • $100 to $250 per one-page email

The Send

You can handle the send yourself using your own computer or server, or you can hire an email service provider (ESP) to help you. If you handle the send yourself, your costs will typically include a one-time fee for the software, and possibly ongoing fees for maintenance and software upgrades. It can be a cost-effective way to go, but don't ignore the fact that you may also need to pay someone to install the software and manage the sends.

Pricing for email marketing software can range from $100 to $500, and more. As far as support goes, some companies don't offer any support at all, while others will charge you anything from $300 to $1000 or more per year, depending on their levels of coverage. Upgrades work similarly -- some are free, but others will cost you as much as the original software license.

ESPs offer a range of options, from self-service (you get access to their tools and handle the send yourself) to full-service (you tell them what you want and they do the rest) offerings, from designing the creative through to sending, tracking, and reporting on the mailout.

Most ESPs charge clients on the basis on the number of emails sent each month. This charge is usually defined as a cost-per-thousand or CPM figure. There's a wide range of CPMs out there, from a low $3, up to $30 or more. The more emails you send, the more bargaining power you have, and the lower the CPM you can negotiate. Other ESPs use flat rates rather than CPMs, though they still base these rates on a range of send quantities (e.g. if you send 1,000 to 4,999 emails a month, you're charged $29.95).

In addition to send costs, ESPs may also charge setup fees (between $1,000 and $15,000), and with full-service providers you'll be required to pay a fee in addition to the CPM for each send to cover these setup costs.

If you have chosen a provider for email marketing services, it should be easy to fill their costs into your budget. If not, you might assume you'll pay costs similar to those shown in Table 3.8 for a cost-effective self-service ESP.

Table 3.8. Average costs of a self-service ESP
1561_table8 (click to view image)

Tracking and Reporting

Standard tracking and reporting of metrics such as deliverables, opens, and clickthroughs, should be included with your purchase of email marketing software or your agreement with your ESP. If this service isn't included, find another vendor.

For more advanced tracking, such as services that track the clickstream your user follows from your email through to your web site's order process, you'll need web analytics software. These packages are a dime a doze -- numerous free versions are available on the Internet, and other, more detailed solutions are available for purchase. Paid versions often offer much friendlier user interfaces, and comprehensive statistics; however, you can get the same information from less expensive packages that let you download the tracking data to Excel -- it just takes more time to decipher your results.

Ask your ESP if it has a web analytics partner that it could recommend -- some ESPs and web analytics software vendors have formed relationships that make it easy to view the full clickstream. The teaming of SubscriberMail with ClickTracks is one such partnership; others are out there.

The purchase of web analytics software generally requires a one-time fee, as well as possible maintenance and upgrade charges down the road. Prices vary, and although some packages are free, they can run to $500 or more, with maintenance costing between $250 to $1,000 a year. Upgrades may cost as much as you paid for the original software license.

Finally, some companies, known as ASPs (application services providers), will give you access to a tool that lets you view your web analytics. While these services cost more than software solutions, they're easier to install and use. The pricing of these solutions start at $100 a month, the cost depending on the level of features available, the service required, and the volumes of traffic your web site attracts.

Creating a Budget

With the assumptions you've made, and the benchmarks you set in the section on goals, you should now have enough data to put together a budget estimate. In Table 3.9 I've included a sample based on the costs we've discussed throughout this section.

Table 3.9. Budget estimate for the Congressional Publications campaign
1561_table9 (click to view image)

In Chapter 1, Why Use Email Marketing?, we learned that Dakin Farm was able to send emails at a cost per send of $400 to their list of 15,000 subscribers. How did they keep their costs so low? By using an email service provider that provided templates for HTML emails, Dakin Farm was able to eliminate copywriting, design, and programming costs. This is a simple way to decrease your cost per send, and increase your profit per send!

Speaking of profit, the next step in our budgeting process -- shown in Table 3.10 -- is to compare your budget and revenue figures to check that, as you execute your campaign, you won't end up in the red.

Table 3.10. Return-on-investment for the Congressional Publications campaign
1561_table10 (click to view image)

With our current figures, our email marketing strategy would return almost $3 for each dollar we spend. That's not a bad return for a start -- many organizations are happy just to break even when they start a new marketing program. If you were expecting a slightly larger return, that's okay, too. You can always go back and tweak the figures until you're happy.

Summary

This chapter focused on developing an effective email marketing strategy.

First, we looked at the key questions that we need to address during this process, considered which types of emails would have the best chance to achieve our goals, and explored possible solutions for sourcing email content. Then, we discussed the circumstances in which it would be suitable to use paid content, and investigated free content sources, too. We then explored, in detail, the processes by which we can determine the ideal frequency for our emails, and define our goals and benchmarks. Finally, I provided you with budget and revenue guidelines to help you anticipate the outlays and returns you might generate from your first campaign.

Remember that a strategic plan is an evolving document. You should constantly be changing it to incorporate what you've learned, and give yourself the best chance of success in the future.

This chapter provided you with the tools you'll need to create an effective email marketing strategy, identify any problems it might have, and fix them ahead of time. The next step? Implementation. Subsequent chapters of The Email Marketing Kit deal with subscriber acquisition and retention, designing email, optimizing deliverability, tracking and reporting on your campaigns, viral marketing, using third-party lists, and more. For full details, see the book's Table of Contents -- and make sure you download this chapter in PDF format, for future reference.

The Power Of Leverage In Network Marketing

Are you a workaholic? I know I have been accused of this by insensitive friends and family that didn't understand my burning desires and relentless need for forward momentum. But even a workaholic can only put in so many hours per day. Let's see... there are 24 hours in a day, 365 days in a year. That's a max of 8760 hours. No sleep, no pottie breaks, no drive time. Maximum 8760 hours. (There were years when I think I came close to that number).

Now, I bet you could get a lot accomplished in 8760 hours. In fact, I would guarantee it. Your performance might be suffering a tad with no sleep though. Okay, just so we are clear... 1 person, working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for 52 weeks = 8760 man hours of effort into building your business.

Let's take a look at leveraging the Network Marketing model. I invest my time and energy into building a business that contains 10 people. I continue to invest my time and energy into training those people so they become actual business owners for themselves and do the same thing. It's in their best interest to continue the trend as we will see in just one minute. So, 10 people, train 10 more people each.... that's 100 people. If each of those 100 people ONLY put in 30 minutes a day, how many man hours could have been funneled into my business success? Care to guess? 18,250 man hours.

Yep, you read that right. 30 minutes a day from each person in my down line gives me 18,250 man hours invested into my business. That's 200+% more than if I worked 24/7 all year long. And that's if the 10 people I worked with initially only work with 10 each and then everyone stops what they are doing.

Just for grins, let's do the math if I had 2000 people in my down line. 2000 people, 30 minutes a day = 365,000 man hours. It would take me 41.6 years of working 24/7 to put in the same number of hours. This is one of the strongest examples of leveraging I have seen in a while. And here is the best part... those hours all spent in my business, ALSO help each of the people in my down line with their business. Again, leverage.

I gave up trading time for money back in 1991 because it is so inefficient. The wealthy know this lesson already and make the most of it everyday. Put the power of "leverage" into building your business with network marketing and watch it grow.

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

5 steps to shortcut your success  (0) 2007.06.25
Email Marketing Strategy: Shortcuts to Success  (0) 2007.06.25
How to make the most of your back office  (0) 2007.06.14
Everything Is Measurable  (0) 2007.06.14
Human Capital  (0) 2007.06.14
How to make the most of your back office
by Paul Rogers and Hernan Saenz

When back-office costs spiral and services fail to deliver, the reflex is often to cut support services across the board. But a recent Bain study of 37 companies—in industries ranging from consumer products to financial services to energy—shows that strategically trimming and reconfiguring support functions such as HR, finance and procurement is often smarter than making wholesale cuts. Done right, it can actually improve effectiveness as it reins in costs.

Companies that focus on support services generate results, and they come in three flavors: higher revenues, more effective service and reduced costs.

To reduce use, companies need to simplify what support functions are expected to deliver and eliminate nonessential activities by focusing on what's most important to the customer or the business. Reducing the number of financial reports at an advertising company we studied, for example, was an easy move to make. A more creative solution is to charge for services, for instance requiring business units to pay for reports from a shared market research function. Often, that reduces use. More important, it creates a market mechanism that favors the most efficient, high-quality services. These types of changes are relatively simple to implement, and in our study, they accounted for an average of 25% of total savings in strategic back-office cost reduction. Shared services also appear to be on the rise: When we polled 1,221 executives at global companies for Bain's 2007 Management Tools and Trends survey, 55% said their companies use shared service centers. There's room for improvement, however, as satisfaction was significantly below the mean for the 29 tools surveyed.

“Companies that focus on support services generate results, and they come in three flavors: higher revenues, more effective service and reduced costs. ”
Hernan Saenz




Listen to a podcast on using G&A as an accelerator or subscribe to Results Brief podcasts.

View an audio slide presentation on this topic.


Redesigning smarter support services requires companies to dissect their processes. The key here is to focus on the most essential processes (financial reporting in finance, for instance, or recruiting in HR), eliminating steps that don't truly contribute to the business. Automation is often part of the solution. In a simple example, one telecom equipment company provided its salespeople with CRM software so they could pull up customer details and price quotes in real time, which improved their speed and effectiveness while also reducing costs. The move allowed the company to trim the sales administration and finance functions that managed and updated customer information. Another step is to purchase better inputs at lower cost by consolidating or bidding out for indirect expenses such as hotels and travel, cleaning and maintenance services, telecommunications, and utilities. Working smarter on the right processes is generally harder to do than simply reducing demand, but it yields more savings, accounting for approximately 35% of total savings in our study.



Restructuring, though hardest to execute, typically has the biggest impact, contributing some 40% of the total savings achieved in our study. The goal is to ensure that support services are located and organized in such a way that they can perform most effectively at lowest cost by, for example, consolidating services currently done in several countries into a regional shared service center or by moving services out of the business units and into corporate headquarters.

Sometimes, restructuring will lead to the decision to outsource. Kyobo Life Insurance, in Korea, added an outsourced call center to support customers so salespeople who used to provide support could focus on selling. The result: a jump in revenue, a dramatic increase in customer service rankings, and a savings of nearly 40% in back-office costs. The right approach is critical: outsourcing, though widespread, continues to fall short of many companies' expectations. Three out of four respondents to our 2007 Management Tools & Trends Survey outsource some functions, but satisfaction remains well below the mean for all tools.

Companies that focus on support services generate results, and they come in three flavors: higher revenues, more effective service and reduced costs. When companies follow this approach, it's like taking off the parking brake and stepping on the accelerator.

Paul Rogers is a partner with Bain & Company in London and head of Bain's Global Organization Practice. Hernan Saenz is a Bain partner in Boston and a senior member of Bain's Performance Improvement Practice.

For more information on improving your back-office effectiveness, read “Make your back office an accelerator,” by Paul Rogers and Hernan Saenz in the March 2007 issue of Harvard Business Review. For more information on Bain's 2007 Management Tools and and Trends Survey findings, read Management Tools and Trends 2007.




More insights
from Bain

Management Tools and Trends 2007
Bain Brief
2007 June
by Darrell Rigby and Barbara Bilodeau

This year's survey found four strong themes: Companies understand the value of managing their customers and acting on customer insights; companies are looking outside their own organizations to innovate and grow; they are also eager to complement cost-cutting tools like Shared Service Centers and Offshoring with tools that help them manage global businesses, as opposed to reducing costs; finally, Bain has identified those that consistently rate above average in both usage and satisfaction across industries.

Growing the “private” club
The Wall Street Journal Asia
2007 May 25
by Orit Gadiesh and Hugh MacArthur

Boards are beginning to ask themselves, "What would we do differently if we were privately held?" And the answer is a lot. Private equity shareholders, particularly those from top firms like Blackstone, behave like active owners—they understand the companies they own and drive them to address problems more rapidly while investing more deeply in attractive longer-term initiatives.

Googling growth
The Wall Street Journal
2007 April 9
by Chris Zook

Facing a slowdown in its core business of selling ads tied to search terms, Google has been scouring the landscape for acquisitions. For most companies, reinvention of a core business doesn't have to involve such high levels of risk. Bain's research shows that nine out of every 10 companies that successfully renewed themselves in the past decade found the solution in mining their hidden assets—assets they already possessed but had failed to tap for maximum growth potential.

The unassured future of wireless data
BusinessWeek Online
2007 April 17
by Rasmus Wegener and Pratap Mukharji

On the surface, it would seem that text messaging and other wireless data services are becoming commonplace. But a recent Bain survey shows that only 10% of US subscribers accounted for more than 90% of all text-message traffic. Such patterns of use indicate that wireless providers will have a harder time expanding their data services profitably.

South Korean PE's second act
The Deal.com
2007 April 10
by Chul-Joon Park and Hugh MacArthur

In the first act of South Korea's private equity drama, foreign investors were both economic saviors and cause for scandal when public sentiment turned against them and investors were accused of opportunism at the expense of locals. But now, entrepreneurs, local companies and adroit private equity firms are starting to work together to reinvigorate underutilized assets, open new markets and spark fresh competition.

To read more articles written by Bain, visit www.bain.com


Reader options




In the news

Toyota's success pleases proponents of 'lean'
USA Today 2007 May 3
A cheer went up last week when Toyota sold more cars and trucks than General Motors. The cheer obviously did not erupt from the US auto industry. Rather, it came from the industry of experts and consultants who sell the no-waste business regimen known as lean manufacturing. A Bain & Company survey shows that only 19% of companies that have tried lean manufacturing are happy with the results, says Mark Gottfredson, the leader of Bain's Global Performance Improvement Practice.

Straight talk
Financial Express 2007 May 7
Private equity funds are increasing their reach in India. Their mere presence there indicates a strong interest in Indian markets. Sri Rajan, who leads the Private Equity Practice at Bain & Company in India, weighs in on the growth issues and sustainability of the funds in India.

Sidbi plans to launch private equity fund
Business Standard 2007 May 1
The Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), the state-run lender to the small-scale sector, is planning to launch a Rs100-crore private equity fund, which will invest in small and midsize companies. A recent study by Bain & Company, a global consultancy firm, said the private equity market in India would more than triple, to $7 billion, by 2010. According to the study, world class differential capabilities in manufacturing and services combined with expanding domestic demand will fuel private equity growth over next 5 years.

Job deferrals add options for students
The Wall Street Journal 2007 May 3
In a bid to attract top talent in a tight job market, companies are letting college seniors interested in philanthropy defer job offers and spend two years teaching at underfunded schools with the nonprofit organization Teach for America. Many well-known employers target similar prospective hires: college seniors with relatively high grade-point averages and leadership positions in campus groups. "What we are looking for are exceptional people who have a passion," says Chris Bierly, a partner at Bain and leader of its undergraduate recruiting, which has in the past let people defer offers to pursue educational fellowships and nonprofit work on a case-by-case basis. "A good number of those folks are drawn to consulting, and they are also drawn to helping their community."
Subscription to WSJ.com required

Fortune's annual "100 Top MBA employers"
Fortune 2007 May 3
Think of it as a popularity contest for companies. Each year, research firm Universum surveys MBA candidates on where they'd most like to work. Global consultant firm Bain & Company ranked #4. A Bain spokesperson says, "The company is always looking for people who are passionate, motivated and rewarded by helping our clients achieve results."

© 2007, Bain & Company www.bain.com

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

Email Marketing Strategy: Shortcuts to Success  (0) 2007.06.25
The Power Of Leverage In Network Marketing  (0) 2007.06.25
Everything Is Measurable  (0) 2007.06.14
Human Capital  (0) 2007.06.14
Make Success Measurable  (0) 2007.06.14

成果主義なんて大嫌いだ!! 査定する側の論理と

矛盾

 成果主義につきものの「人事考課制度」。サラリーマンの昇進や給与に直接、影響するだけに、公正で透明な評価が望まれるが、実際には多くの矛盾も抱えている。人事考課が、会社員のメンタルヘルスに悪影響を与えているとの調査報告もある。本邦初、「考課者」緊急アンケートなどから、その実態に迫った。

本誌 奥田祥子/イラスト 成田輝昭

写真

 「評価基準があいまいで評価するのが難しいことが前提で、部下の成果を相対的にランクづけしなければならないのがとても悩ましい」

 「自分が部下につけた評価が上司によって覆され、部下に考課結果をどう説明すればよいのか分からない」――。

 成果主義に基づく人事考課制度で考課を担当する30~59歳の「考課者」100人を対象にした本誌の緊急アンケートからは、こんな悩める本音が明らかになった(調査協力・インフォプラント)。

 成果主義に基づく人事考課制度は、1990年代後半から日本企業で導入され始め、今では広く浸透している。役職に就いていない会社員の場合、自分が所属する部署の課長クラスがまず一次考課を行い、さらにその上の部長クラスが二次考課を行うケースが多い。管理職自身も自分の上司によって、考課がなされている。会社が定める評価基準に基づき、5段階などのランク分け、つまり査定が行われ、昇給や昇進などの処遇に影響する。多くの企業において、人事考課制度は、サラリーマンの給与を決める重要な要素となっているのである。

 こんななか、「考課される側」は、「考課する側」に向けて、不満や怒りをぶつけている。それについては、これまで本誌をはじめ、多くのマスコミが取り上げてきた。しかし、考課者自身も、会社が定めた人事考課制度のもとで、悩み、苦しんでいる現実がある。今回は、そこに着目して、「考課する側」の実態を明らかにするべくアンケートを実施したのである。

7割が制度に矛盾

 アンケート結果を見ると、実に7割が制度に矛盾を抱き、6割が部下を評価することにストレスを感じている、と答えている。この制度はさまざまな矛盾や問題点も抱えていることが分かる。成果主義人事・賃金制度に詳しいジャーナリストの溝上憲文さんは、こう話す。

 「そもそも人事のプロではない現場の上司が、部下を評価すること自体、非常に難しいことです。人事考課制度は企業経営者にとっては社員の競争意識を高めるという建前はあっても、実際には人件費抑制策として作用している面が強い。そのため、あらかじめ決められた人件費の原資、評価配分の中で高い評価から低い評価までを相対的に振り分けざるを得ない。考課者としては、絶対評価としたいのにそうできず、最終的な部下の評価が自分のつけた評価と食い違ったりして、頭を痛めているケースが多いと考えられます」

 評価基準や方法の問題もある。社会経済生産性本部が2003年に全国の上場企業を対象に行った調査によると、現行の人事考課制度について「改善の必要がある」と回答した248社(全体の82%)のうち、同制度の問題点として、83.5%が「評価者間での評価基準の統一が難しい」点を挙げた。次いで、多かったのが、「目標のレベルや達成度の基準を設定するのが困難」(60.5%)、「仕事の質の異なる人を適切に評価するのが困難」(55.2%)だった(左のグラフ参照)。

 同生産性本部雇用システム研究センターの東狐貴一・主任研究員の分析は、こうだ。

 「たとえば、仕事の成果を比較的数値化しやすい営業部門と、数値化が難しい総務部門とを同じ基準で評価するのは困難を極めます。また、達成度を測る土台となる目標設定についても、現在は考課対象者と直属の上司である一次考課者が話し合って決める場合が多いのですが、目標をどの程度に定めるかは、なかなか難しいのが現状です」

 近年では、これらの問題点を踏まえ、結果だけではなく、プロセス、行動面の評価も重視する企業が増えているという。企画力や判断力、交渉力といった評価項目だ。ただ、プロセス評価についても、今のところ、実効性のある打開策にはなっていないようだ。

 「結果と、そこに至る過程の両方を重視しようという考えは良いのですが、結局、最終的には、それも数値化して評価しなくてはならない。もともと数字で表すのが難しい基準なだけに、考課者にとっては、より困難さが増しているとも言えます」(東狐主任研究員)

 本誌アンケートで、考課者の悩みとして多かったのが、考課結果のフィードバック作業だった。人事考課制度には公平性や透明性に加え、納得性が必要とされている。そのため、考課結果を、考課者、なかでも一次考課者が、考課対象者に直接、説明するケースが増えている。

結果説明で部下に疎まれる

 だが、実際には、一次考課者の意に反した考課結果が出る場合もあり、結果をしっかりと説明し、部下に納得してもらうのは容易なことではない。

 「部下に疎まれるなど、人間関係がギクシャクしている」

 などという声もアンケートでは目立った。

 「考課が上の段階に進むほど、評価配分の調整的な要素が強まり、一次考課者や考課対象者にとっては、最終的な考課結果を納得し難い傾向が強くなっていく」(東狐主任研究員)

 というのが実情なのだ。

 そして、忘れてはいけないのは、考課者自身も自分の上司から考課をされている立場にあることだ。部下を納得させられるかどうかが、自身の評価を左右することにもなり、さらに悩みは尽きないというわけだ。

 深刻なのは、こうした成果主義人事制度の浸透は、会社員の精神面にも影響を与えていることだ。

 「成果主義とメンタルヘルス」の著者で精神科医、産業医の天笠崇さんは、こう指摘する。

 「長時間労働や仕事のノルマといった要素は以前からあったものですが、成果主義の導入によって、進捗(しんちょく)目標管理や成果の評価が明確に示されるようになった分、なお一層厳しくなり、会社員のストレス増大につながっています。さらに、自身の評価に対する不満や職場のコミュニケーション、助け合いの低下も、精神面へのダメージに拍車をかけていると考えられます」

 社会経済生産性本部メンタル・ヘルス研究所の06年の調査によると、61.5%の企業(回答企業総数218社)が、この3年間に、うつ病など「心の病」を患う社員が「増加傾向」にあると回答。心の病による「1か月以上の休業者」がいる企業は74.8%にも上った。

評価がメンタルヘルスに影響

写真

 06年版「産業人メンタルヘルス白書」(同生産性本部)では、会社員の「(自分への)評価への満足感」が01年以降、連続的に低下し、自分の評価に納得できない、すなわち満足度が低いと、精神的健康度も低いと分析。成果主義人事考課制度とメンタルヘルスの関連性を指摘している。

 天笠さんのクリニックでは、仕事のストレスをきっかけに、うつ病を発病した患者が増えており、休業を勧めても、「評価が下がるのが怖い」などの理由で仕事を続け、治療が順調に進まないケースが少なくないという。最近は特に、病状がかなり悪化した状態で受診する人が増えている。

 「仕事がきっかけで病を患い、受診したのはいいが、また仕事のために十分に治療もできない、という悪循環に陥っているように感じられます。個人差はありますが、成果主義人事制度のもとで、精神面の健康を維持するには、仕事と一定の距離を置くことも必要になってくるのではないでしょうか。たとえば、自分が担当する顧客は大事にするが、評価結果にはそれほどこだわらない。家庭や地域にも、時間とエネルギーを割くような働き方です」(天笠さん)

 とはいえども、現実にはそうすぐには転換できないという会社員が多いのではないだろうか。

 では、現在の成果主義のもとで、人事考課制度をより良い方向に改善していくにはどうすればよいのか。前出の溝上さんは、考課者の評価権限を強めることの重要性を指摘する。

 「部門間の評価の格差や評価基準の不統一といった問題点をクリアするためには、考課者である管理職に評価権限と賃金原資を委譲する必要があると思います。評価基準についても、管理職の判断によって、各部門が仕事の実態に即した項目を設けるのです。そうすれば、人事考課制度の公平性や納得性はもっと高まるのではないでしょうか」

 考課される側、考課する側にとっても、人事考課に臨む姿勢を改善する余地はある。前出の東狐主任研究員は、こう話す。

 「会社側が人事考課の過程や結果についての情報公開を進めたうえで、考課される側も考課する側も制度への理解を深め、納得がいくまで目標設定や考課結果について、上司、部下と主張し合うべきです」

 何も言わなくても、上司は自分のことを見ていてくれている、部下は自分のことを分かってくれている、という時代ではなくなったのだ。成果主義時代を生き抜くには、会社員自身の意識改革も求められている。

Everything Is Measurable

May 23, 2007CIO — The "I.T. VALUE MEASURE PROBLEM" is ubiquitous in companies today. Business executives often hear a mantra from their IT departments that goes something like this: "We can’t measure the value of IT. It’s too intangible." If the line works, and IT leaders persuade business executives that IT investments are somehow fundamentally different from other types of business investment, IT is relieved of the responsibility of attaching dollar values to those investments.

Some high-profile CIOs have gotten extended mileage from this approach. Paul Strassmann (the CIO guru) often recounts the story of being put on the spot to justify the costs of IT at Xerox Corp., where he was corporate director of worldwide computing. Since that uncomfortable experience, he has argued that evaluating an IT investment in the same manner that most other departments evaluate their efforts is nearly impossible. After all, he points out, accounting departments are never required to justify their budgets. IT is just as basic to the business as accounting, right? So the IT budget likewise should be exempt from the messiness of justification.

As one might imagine, this position is popular among some IT executives because it gets them off the hook. There is only one problem. Many business executives just aren’t buying it. And they shouldn’t. Unlike the accounting department, the IT department typically has a large and rapidly growing budget . In addition, most IT departments have had at least a few high-profile failures, causing business executives to be somewhat suspicious of IT’s value.

Other IT executives believe that only pseudomeasurements are possible. A method misleadingly dubbed Information Economics (I defy anyone to find any real economics in this method) was developed by Marilyn Parker and Robert Benson. It is basically a subjective scoring procedure that computes a composite score based on a completely arbitrary formula. It is, in effect, a nonquantitative method masquerading as a quantitative one by using numbers and a simple formula.

The first problem is that results have no meaning when compared to other investments: What would you rather have, a retooling of a plant with a 62 percent ROI or an IT investment with a "score" of 95? The second problem is that, to date, there is no empirical evidence that this method improves decisions.

So how should CIOs deal with the problem of measuring IT value? They should start by considering the possibility that the value of IT actually is measurable. Of course, this flies in the face of much of the last two decades of IT dogma, but then it wouldn’t be the first time dogma proved wrong.

'Global Biz Forum > English Study' 카테고리의 다른 글

The Power Of Leverage In Network Marketing  (0) 2007.06.25
How to make the most of your back office  (0) 2007.06.14
Human Capital  (0) 2007.06.14
Make Success Measurable  (0) 2007.06.14
How Can We Determine Our CRM Readiness?  (0) 2007.06.14
Human Capital
이원모2004-03-11 13:26:36 조회: 19
Human capital consists of the skills, knowledge, and other factors, such as health, that improve an individual’s ability to produce goods and services. One reason people earn different incomes for different jobs are that they differ in the quantity and quality of their human capital.
Human capital is developed through education and training. By investing time, energy, and money in human capital, people expect to be more productive and to receive a higher income, greater job satisfaction, and better job opportunities. It is important for students to realize that decisions that they make now will influence their development of skills and knowledge in the future.

+ Recent posts